November 26, 2008 8:00 AM
- Text
Cablevision Forces Verizon to Modify Ad Claims for FiOS
(MoneyWatch) As cable and satellite TV systems carve up the country for TV, internet and phone service, sometimes the battle comes down to the details. That's what the National Advertising Division found when it ruled in a dispute between Cablevision and Verizon Tuesday, forcing Verizon to stop advertising some claims for its FiOS service.
Verizon had been claiming that with FiOS, "Channels came on quicker," and "the colors were more vivid," which, now that you look at it in the cold light of day, sounds like a load of rubbish on its face. These claims were unsupported by evidence, NAD found. Verizon begrudgingly agreed to "take into consideration" NAD's findings, which is client-speak for "we won't do this again, if only to avoid the legal bills."
Verizon can take some comfort from the fact that NAD agreed with many of its ad claims. The ruling states:
Verizon had been claiming that with FiOS, "Channels came on quicker," and "the colors were more vivid," which, now that you look at it in the cold light of day, sounds like a load of rubbish on its face. These claims were unsupported by evidence, NAD found. Verizon begrudgingly agreed to "take into consideration" NAD's findings, which is client-speak for "we won't do this again, if only to avoid the legal bills."
Verizon can take some comfort from the fact that NAD agreed with many of its ad claims. The ruling states:
NAD found that the advertiser's head-to-head testing provided a reasonable basis for its claims, "you can really see the difference between cable and FiOS" picture quality, and "the picture was clearer." NAD observed that the advertiser's testing specifically asked the participants which television offered a clearer picture. NAD noted that the advertiser's head-to-head test asked the participants which television had the "best picture quality" and which offered the "better sound quality. In both instances, the majority preferred the advertiser's service.The ruling doesn't name the ad agency responsible (a flaw in NAD's process, IMHO). But McCann Erickson produced this ad with Michael Bay for the brand earlier this year.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Nationwide foreclosure pact gains momentum
- Board shake-up at Yahoo
- Fed: Consumer borrowing sees strong growth
- Greek debt talks drag on, banks signal progress
- Dow approaches 13,000, one rally from a record
- Market braces for federal budget battle
- How to handle passive aggressive employees | Leila's House of Corrections
- 4 ways to overcome price resistance on sales
- New York, Calif. holding out foreclosure settlement
- Bernanke sticks with low-rate policy at hearing
- Job openings up: Here's how to get one yourself
- Apple patent throws wrench into Facebook plans
- Yum! Brands forecasts strong expansion overseas
- Cash balance retirement plans: Annuity options
- Tax prep tips: Jill Schlesinger makes it easy
- Why is Greece negotiating over debt when it could be dictating?
- Job openings jump to a near 3-year high
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Prosecutors want Sandusky kept indoors pre-trial
- Study: Ocean fish may have freshwater ancestor
- Oil rises to near $99 after US crude supply drop
- Asia stocks up following surge on Wall Street
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






