July 7, 2009 7:53 PM
- Text
Kroger Clobbered in Tainted Food Recalls
(MoneyWatch) Food has become an important category for retailers trying to cope with a tight-fisted consumer in a prolonged recession, but it can be a risky business, particularly as stores take on more direct responsibility for delivering to the public products that can cause serious illness.
Over the past week or two, Kroger particularly has gotten pounded and has had to run a series of recalls that raised consumer concerns. Kroger got burned on beef contamination almost exactly a year ago, so this particular run of luck has to be particularly disheartening.
Perishable food segments such as meat, where supermarkets traditionally processed much of what they sold, have always held a certain amount of risk, but, the danger is becoming more acute with the expansion of private label products and the development of processed and partially processed convenience food under store brand names. Given the nature of food safety failures, problems inevitably tie retailers into concerns about illness even if they correctly followed food safety procedures. When more product in stores was branded, at least retailers didn't have to face the problem alone. Today, it might be a supplier's fault that a product or even an ingredient was contaminated further back along the distribution chain, but if a retailer has its name on a product, consumers, government and investors are going to inevitably look at it as having responsibility for a problem.
Just in time for the Fourth of July holiday, a recall of beef products originating with JBS Swift Beef Co., of Greeley, Colo., spread across food retailing and garnered massive media attention. Kroger was caught in an initial recall, which it issued to customers on June 30, that affected beef sold under its private label program. Yet, when the United States Department of Agriculture expanded the recall last week, food retailers ranging from Loblaw in Canada to Costco in the U.S. also had to issue recall notices for products that, again, were being sold under own brand names.
Bad as that was, food retailers were forced to recall an additional range of products last week. On July 2, Kroger ?€" hit again -- recalled private label popcorn seasoning and butter flavored sprinkles due to salmonella concerns. Problems related to the July 2 recall caused it to ask customers to return still more products on July 6.
Others have been hit by the salmonella scare, which originated with ingredients emerging from the Plainview Milk Products Cooperative, of Plainview, Minn. Meijer and Ahold USA chains Stop & Shop and Giant recalled nonfat dry milk, cocoa and other products due to possible contamination. In those cases as well, the products involved were private label items. Malt-O-Meal had to issue a product recall for oatmeal, but at least in that case, retailers involved could point to a recognized supplier. In the case of private label products, it was retailer names on the packages.
Retailers have been working with vendors to strengthen food safety standards that sometimes are outdated and subject to jurisdictional confusion between federal agencies, and sometimes between them and local authorities. In the end, retailers may be forced to become more effective watchdogs than government in the case of food safety, as they have more to lose in cases when private label programs are key to their strategies.
Over the past week or two, Kroger particularly has gotten pounded and has had to run a series of recalls that raised consumer concerns. Kroger got burned on beef contamination almost exactly a year ago, so this particular run of luck has to be particularly disheartening.
Perishable food segments such as meat, where supermarkets traditionally processed much of what they sold, have always held a certain amount of risk, but, the danger is becoming more acute with the expansion of private label products and the development of processed and partially processed convenience food under store brand names. Given the nature of food safety failures, problems inevitably tie retailers into concerns about illness even if they correctly followed food safety procedures. When more product in stores was branded, at least retailers didn't have to face the problem alone. Today, it might be a supplier's fault that a product or even an ingredient was contaminated further back along the distribution chain, but if a retailer has its name on a product, consumers, government and investors are going to inevitably look at it as having responsibility for a problem.
Just in time for the Fourth of July holiday, a recall of beef products originating with JBS Swift Beef Co., of Greeley, Colo., spread across food retailing and garnered massive media attention. Kroger was caught in an initial recall, which it issued to customers on June 30, that affected beef sold under its private label program. Yet, when the United States Department of Agriculture expanded the recall last week, food retailers ranging from Loblaw in Canada to Costco in the U.S. also had to issue recall notices for products that, again, were being sold under own brand names.
Bad as that was, food retailers were forced to recall an additional range of products last week. On July 2, Kroger ?€" hit again -- recalled private label popcorn seasoning and butter flavored sprinkles due to salmonella concerns. Problems related to the July 2 recall caused it to ask customers to return still more products on July 6.
Others have been hit by the salmonella scare, which originated with ingredients emerging from the Plainview Milk Products Cooperative, of Plainview, Minn. Meijer and Ahold USA chains Stop & Shop and Giant recalled nonfat dry milk, cocoa and other products due to possible contamination. In those cases as well, the products involved were private label items. Malt-O-Meal had to issue a product recall for oatmeal, but at least in that case, retailers involved could point to a recognized supplier. In the case of private label products, it was retailer names on the packages.
Retailers have been working with vendors to strengthen food safety standards that sometimes are outdated and subject to jurisdictional confusion between federal agencies, and sometimes between them and local authorities. In the end, retailers may be forced to become more effective watchdogs than government in the case of food safety, as they have more to lose in cases when private label programs are key to their strategies.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Rep. Bachus faces insider-trading investigation
- Singapore DBS bank profit jumps 7.8 percent in 4Q
- Owner of Sierra mine surrenders to face charges
- Asia stocks slip as Greek bailout remains in limbo
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
on CBS News






