February 6, 2009 11:46 AM
- Text
Wal-Mart Does the Right Thing Dropping Monthly Estimate
(MoneyWatch) Wal-Mart should be congratulated and not just on posting good numbers in January but also on eliminating its monthly comparable store sales estimate.
Monthly estimates in retail provide superficial figures that are as likely to misinform as to inform. For one thing, retailers can easily manipulate them. By engaging in a deep discount in a given month, a retailer can boost its comparable store sales, but the increase comes at the expense of profits. Because profits are reported quarterly, the move is disguised, potentially for several weeks.
Retail also is deeply affected by the calendar and weather. If a holiday such as Easter shifts from one month to another, two monthly results are deeply distorted. This year, Thanksgiving shifted a couple of days further into the holiday season and had an impact that went largely unremarked because of the economic slump, but one that was responsible for some of the strength seen in Black Friday sales. Blaming the weather is an old retail dodge, but sometimes it has a foundation. Look at Hot Topic and its recent results, for example. In January, Hot Topic had positive comparable store sales in every region of the country, which was true of December with the exception of the Northwest. The region had lousy weather in December and that was reflected in the monthly comp.
The real problem with monthly reporting is that observers, particularly on Wall Street, look only at the number and not the circumstances. The result can be unjustified volatility that is a management distraction and may even prompt operational decisions that anticipate investor response to a number that isn't reflective of actual operations.
Folks affiliated with Wall Street will complain that the Wal-Mart decision creates a lack of transparency and forces investors to guess more in their buying. A lot of complainers, though, make money by jumping on every figure companies report. Wal-Mart's decision to end monthly comparable store sales estimates at least assures that its contribution to the market conversation determining share price better reflects operational performance rather than manipulation or incidental occurrence. If Wall Street gets jumpy between quarters, that's its business.
Monthly estimates in retail provide superficial figures that are as likely to misinform as to inform. For one thing, retailers can easily manipulate them. By engaging in a deep discount in a given month, a retailer can boost its comparable store sales, but the increase comes at the expense of profits. Because profits are reported quarterly, the move is disguised, potentially for several weeks.
Retail also is deeply affected by the calendar and weather. If a holiday such as Easter shifts from one month to another, two monthly results are deeply distorted. This year, Thanksgiving shifted a couple of days further into the holiday season and had an impact that went largely unremarked because of the economic slump, but one that was responsible for some of the strength seen in Black Friday sales. Blaming the weather is an old retail dodge, but sometimes it has a foundation. Look at Hot Topic and its recent results, for example. In January, Hot Topic had positive comparable store sales in every region of the country, which was true of December with the exception of the Northwest. The region had lousy weather in December and that was reflected in the monthly comp.
The real problem with monthly reporting is that observers, particularly on Wall Street, look only at the number and not the circumstances. The result can be unjustified volatility that is a management distraction and may even prompt operational decisions that anticipate investor response to a number that isn't reflective of actual operations.
Folks affiliated with Wall Street will complain that the Wal-Mart decision creates a lack of transparency and forces investors to guess more in their buying. A lot of complainers, though, make money by jumping on every figure companies report. Wal-Mart's decision to end monthly comparable store sales estimates at least assures that its contribution to the market conversation determining share price better reflects operational performance rather than manipulation or incidental occurrence. If Wall Street gets jumpy between quarters, that's its business.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- The nation's weather
- Filmmaker Douglas Trumbull receives honorary Oscar
- Houston's body taken to morgue; autopsy planned
- Obama to submit his budget to Congress on Monday
on Facebook
- Whitney Houston 1963-2012
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Remembering Whitney Houston 1963-2012
on CBS News






