September 10, 2010 9:57 AM
- Text
Jobs: What The President Won't Tell You
When President Obama talks about the economy at today's White House news conference, here's what he won't say: we're screwed on job creation for a while. Instead, he'll say that the combined $180 billion in new infrastructure and investment plans (don't call it "stimulus"!) will inject a shot of adrenaline into the nation's sagging economic recovery, help address the nation's long-term needs and spur job creation.
I doubt that the proposals will create jobs, but that's nothing new. While the economy has recovered from the depths of the Great Recession in many ways, the job situation simply stinks. While each of the initiatives may be worthy, they don't address a simple fact: businesses hire when increased demand for goods or services forces them to do so. That's clearly not the case in today's economy.
To make myself feel better about this fact, I talked to a few economists who reminded me that job creation is usually the last part of the recovery--that was the case after the two last recessions. Perhaps of greater significance, the US labor market has been shifting under our feet for at least a decade. Private employment today stands at about the same level as 1999 due to technological advances, globalization and corporate outsourcing. All of these factors have increased the efficiency of the world economy, leading to a huge rise in corporate profitability, at the expense of job creation in the US.
So, who benefited from that spike in profitability? In econo-speak, we say that the money went to capital owners, but James Surowiecki of The New Yorker spelled it out more clearly: that money went to the very wealthiest Americans. He notes that between 2002-2007, "the bottom ninety-nine percent of incomes grew 1.3 percent a year, in real terms-while the incomes of the top one percent grew ten percent a year."
It's just like my grandfather used to say, "it's the Golden Rule-those with the gold, rule!"
Or to be less sassy, what we know is that over the past two decades, the economy became seriously distorted. Many American consumers spent money not based on what the earned, but by using easy credit or tapping their homes like ATM machines. That spending binge is over, and in the future things are going to move more slowly. This hurts in the short-term, but is essential if we are to restore the basic foundation of the US economy.
Image by Flickr User JoshBerglund19, CC 2.0
© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
I doubt that the proposals will create jobs, but that's nothing new. While the economy has recovered from the depths of the Great Recession in many ways, the job situation simply stinks. While each of the initiatives may be worthy, they don't address a simple fact: businesses hire when increased demand for goods or services forces them to do so. That's clearly not the case in today's economy.
To make myself feel better about this fact, I talked to a few economists who reminded me that job creation is usually the last part of the recovery--that was the case after the two last recessions. Perhaps of greater significance, the US labor market has been shifting under our feet for at least a decade. Private employment today stands at about the same level as 1999 due to technological advances, globalization and corporate outsourcing. All of these factors have increased the efficiency of the world economy, leading to a huge rise in corporate profitability, at the expense of job creation in the US.
So, who benefited from that spike in profitability? In econo-speak, we say that the money went to capital owners, but James Surowiecki of The New Yorker spelled it out more clearly: that money went to the very wealthiest Americans. He notes that between 2002-2007, "the bottom ninety-nine percent of incomes grew 1.3 percent a year, in real terms-while the incomes of the top one percent grew ten percent a year."
It's just like my grandfather used to say, "it's the Golden Rule-those with the gold, rule!"
Or to be less sassy, what we know is that over the past two decades, the economy became seriously distorted. Many American consumers spent money not based on what the earned, but by using easy credit or tapping their homes like ATM machines. That spending binge is over, and in the future things are going to move more slowly. This hurts in the short-term, but is essential if we are to restore the basic foundation of the US economy.
Image by Flickr User JoshBerglund19, CC 2.0
-
Jill Schlesinger Jill Schlesinger, CFP®, is the Editor-at-Large for CBS MoneyWatch. She covers the economy, markets, investing or anything else with a dollar sign. Prior to the launch of MoneyWatch in 2009, Jill was the chief investment officer for an independent investment advisory firm. In her infancy, she was an options trader on the Commodities Exchange of New York.
Follow on Twitter »
Add A Comment +
Popular Now in MoneyWatch
- 10 Best Countries To Live and Work Abroad
- 4 Things Not to Buy at Costco
- Top 10 Cities for Single Men
- Analysts: Europe bank run is under way
- Top 10 Places to Live in 2011
- Used Cars: 5 to Avoid (and 5 Better Alternatives)
- Chilean copper giant Codelco CEO resigns
- How to handle sexual misconduct at work
- Made in USA: 5 Great American Cars Made Here
- The holy grail of leadership
- Reverse Cell Phone Lookup Service is Free and Simple
- Injury forces Michael McKean out of Broadway show
- Doctors report rise in kids eating detergent packs
- 5 Things You Should Buy at Costco
- FACT CHECK: Romney off on Obama's love for unions
- Can Tim Cook do what Steve Jobs couldn't?






