November 17, 2009 9:15 AM
- Text
TARP Audit Finds Geithner Gave Away The Farm
Special Inspector General for TARP (aka "SIGTARP") Neil Barofsky said something we've all known for a while: the government gave away the farm when AIG failed.
If you recall, AIG's failure meant that the companies on the other side of all of its contracts (counterparties) were going to be left holding the bag. Under normal cases of bankruptcy, the court would impose haircuts to the amount of money due to counterparties, but because AIG didn't actually declare bankruptcy, the counterparties claimed that they were owed 100 cents of every dollar. The only bank that even considered taking a haircut was UBS--the Swiss, for goodness sakes--hard to imagine that a Swiss bank could make US banks look bad, but here's a case in point.
OK, so let's get this straight: the financial world is melting down, Uncle Sam had just saved the bankers' butts and now Tim Geithner the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) was going to wimp-out? Yes, the Great Gazoo strikes again! (My friend pointed out that our current Treasury Secretary and former tax cheat bears a striking resemblance to this esoteric character from "The Flintstones" -- Geithner has been the Great Gazoo since!)
When Geithner/Gazoo says, "Hello Dumb Dumb," he's talking to us! The Great Gazoo shafted the US taxpayer in the AIG debacle and in the process, enriched the counterparties who dragged us into this mess. The SIG TARP report noted that "structure and effect of the FRBNY's assistance to AIG ... effectively transferred tens of billions of dollars of cash from the government to AIG's counterparties".
Oh, and remember all of those claims by Goldman Sachs brass that the firm had "perfectly hedged" its exposure to AIG? Not so fast, boys. According to the New York Times, "among its notable findings, the report challenged Goldman's position that it should not have been forced to bear losses on its dealings with A.I.G. because it had successfully hedged away any exposure. Mr. Barofsky said that Goldman's hedges were unlikely to have held up amid the market turbulence of late last year."
Barofsky seems to be one of the few officials that has to tell us what we already know: TARP is "almost certainly going to be a loss"for taxpayers and Geithner rolled over for Wall Street in the AIG negotiations.
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved. If you recall, AIG's failure meant that the companies on the other side of all of its contracts (counterparties) were going to be left holding the bag. Under normal cases of bankruptcy, the court would impose haircuts to the amount of money due to counterparties, but because AIG didn't actually declare bankruptcy, the counterparties claimed that they were owed 100 cents of every dollar. The only bank that even considered taking a haircut was UBS--the Swiss, for goodness sakes--hard to imagine that a Swiss bank could make US banks look bad, but here's a case in point.
OK, so let's get this straight: the financial world is melting down, Uncle Sam had just saved the bankers' butts and now Tim Geithner the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (FRBNY) was going to wimp-out? Yes, the Great Gazoo strikes again! (My friend pointed out that our current Treasury Secretary and former tax cheat bears a striking resemblance to this esoteric character from "The Flintstones" -- Geithner has been the Great Gazoo since!)
When Geithner/Gazoo says, "Hello Dumb Dumb," he's talking to us! The Great Gazoo shafted the US taxpayer in the AIG debacle and in the process, enriched the counterparties who dragged us into this mess. The SIG TARP report noted that "structure and effect of the FRBNY's assistance to AIG ... effectively transferred tens of billions of dollars of cash from the government to AIG's counterparties".
Oh, and remember all of those claims by Goldman Sachs brass that the firm had "perfectly hedged" its exposure to AIG? Not so fast, boys. According to the New York Times, "among its notable findings, the report challenged Goldman's position that it should not have been forced to bear losses on its dealings with A.I.G. because it had successfully hedged away any exposure. Mr. Barofsky said that Goldman's hedges were unlikely to have held up amid the market turbulence of late last year."
Barofsky seems to be one of the few officials that has to tell us what we already know: TARP is "almost certainly going to be a loss"for taxpayers and Geithner rolled over for Wall Street in the AIG negotiations.
-
Jill Schlesinger Jill Schlesinger, CFP®, is the Editor-at-Large for CBS MoneyWatch. She covers the economy, markets, investing or anything else with a dollar sign. Prior to the launch of MoneyWatch in 2009, Jill was the chief investment officer for an independent investment advisory firm. In her infancy, she was an options trader on the Commodities Exchange of New York.
Follow on Twitter »
Add A Comment +
Popular Now in MoneyWatch
- 10 Best Countries To Live and Work Abroad
- 4 Things Not to Buy at Costco
- Top 10 Cities for Single Men
- Analysts: Europe bank run is under way
- Top 10 Places to Live in 2011
- Chilean copper giant Codelco CEO resigns
- Used Cars: 5 to Avoid (and 5 Better Alternatives)
- How to handle sexual misconduct at work
- Made in USA: 5 Great American Cars Made Here
- The holy grail of leadership
- Reverse Cell Phone Lookup Service is Free and Simple
- Injury forces Michael McKean out of Broadway show
- Doctors report rise in kids eating detergent packs
- 5 Things You Should Buy at Costco
- Can Tim Cook do what Steve Jobs couldn't?
- FACT CHECK: Romney off on Obama's love for unions






