July 7, 2009 1:29 PM
- Text
Taibbi's Goldman Sachs Story: Those with the Gold, Rule
(MoneyWatch) You know that someone has struck a nerve when everyone on Wall Street is talking about Rolling Stone magazine for the first time in about twenty years. Author Matt Taibbi's article about Goldman Sachs, "The Great American Bubble Machine," is causing quite a ruckus everywhere I turn.
I have had a strange relationship to Goldman Sachs ever since my older sister worked there one summer during college. She came home each day to recount her awe of the mighty machine. In turn, I was immediately repulsed and thought that it must be hogwash. (Full disclosure: I have relatives and friends who currently work at Goldman.)
As I matured in my career in financial services, I came to respect and revile Goldman. This is in large part because they often attract smart, hard-working employees, but for some reason, many of them feel the need to talk about how smart, hard-working and rich they are. This is not an attractive quality.
I once asked a friend who had dealt with Goldman for many years what he thought differentiated them from the other firms. It wasn't their intelligence or work ethic. Rather, more than any other financial organization, he said that Goldman had created a culture that promotes the firm over the employee. If two business units are vying for the same client, they get together and figure out the best solution. I'm sure this collegial environment breaks down sporadically, but it makes sense that without cutthroat back-fighting, an organization can operate more efficiently and productively.
That said, I've been mystified how Goldman seems to possess an almost Teflon-like quality when it comes to managing the obvious conflicts that are rife in their business lines. Are regulators intimidated by the Goldman mystique?
I'm not convinced that Taibbi's conspiracy theory is behind it all, but there's no disputing two facts: (1) Goldman alum populate the government and (2) Taibbi's article is tapping into some feeling that the playing field is not exactly level. It's just a variation of the Golden Rule: those with the gold, rule. In this case, we'll call it the "Goldman Rule".
Image by Flickr User Bullion Vault, cc 2.0
I have had a strange relationship to Goldman Sachs ever since my older sister worked there one summer during college. She came home each day to recount her awe of the mighty machine. In turn, I was immediately repulsed and thought that it must be hogwash. (Full disclosure: I have relatives and friends who currently work at Goldman.)
As I matured in my career in financial services, I came to respect and revile Goldman. This is in large part because they often attract smart, hard-working employees, but for some reason, many of them feel the need to talk about how smart, hard-working and rich they are. This is not an attractive quality.
I once asked a friend who had dealt with Goldman for many years what he thought differentiated them from the other firms. It wasn't their intelligence or work ethic. Rather, more than any other financial organization, he said that Goldman had created a culture that promotes the firm over the employee. If two business units are vying for the same client, they get together and figure out the best solution. I'm sure this collegial environment breaks down sporadically, but it makes sense that without cutthroat back-fighting, an organization can operate more efficiently and productively.
That said, I've been mystified how Goldman seems to possess an almost Teflon-like quality when it comes to managing the obvious conflicts that are rife in their business lines. Are regulators intimidated by the Goldman mystique?
I'm not convinced that Taibbi's conspiracy theory is behind it all, but there's no disputing two facts: (1) Goldman alum populate the government and (2) Taibbi's article is tapping into some feeling that the playing field is not exactly level. It's just a variation of the Golden Rule: those with the gold, rule. In this case, we'll call it the "Goldman Rule".
Image by Flickr User Bullion Vault, cc 2.0
-
Jill Schlesinger Jill Schlesinger, CFP®, is the Editor-at-Large for CBS MoneyWatch. She covers the economy, markets, investing or anything else with a dollar sign. Prior to the launch of MoneyWatch in 2009, Jill was the chief investment officer for an independent investment advisory firm. In her infancy, she was an options trader on the Commodities Exchange of New York.
Follow on Twitter »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Smaller krewes have big impact on Mardi Gras
- Smaller krewes have big impact on Mardi Gras
- 28 more airports will test lower-hassle screening
- Terminal shut down temporarily, grenade found
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






