June 12, 2009 9:23 AM
- Text
Wall Street Reform: Regulators and Lawmakers Prepare for Turf War
(MoneyWatch) A former SEC Commissioner recently said to me "Never let a good crisis go to waste." That post-crisis sentiment has been echoed by the Obama Administration, lawmakers and regulators alike.
You might think a near financial melt-down would have at least one benefit: a chance to re-boot the regulatory process and start anew. While almost everyone agrees that we need to create a more streamlined and nimble regulatory process, there's little consensus on how to get there. It's kind of like heaven...everyone thinks it's a great place, but no one wants to be the first to go.
To understand the complexity of regulatory reform, check out this Financial Times chart from this morning's edition:
You might think that a dozen or so regulators might be enough to do the job, but evidently not. The "Balkanized" approach to regulation seems ludicrous, but then again, the British have a single watchdog in the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and that didn't stop the mess.
It's about to get even more complicated. Next week, it is expected that Treasury Secretary Geithner will announce that he wants a "Council of Regulators" which will watch over the the newly-anointed systemic risk overseer--the Federal Reserve.
As you review that chart again, think not only about the heads of these agencies fighting for power, relevancy and redemption, remember that each agency has a corresponding lawmaker that oversees it. Rather than work together to improve the system, regulatory reform could become a classic political turf war. The problem is that once someone has the ball, he's reluctant to give it up.
It's just not that easy to fix this mess. We need regulation that fosters free markets, not free-for-all markets. One that monitors systemic risk; ensures the safety and soundness of individual institutions; and oversees business conduct so that investors are protected. Now can someone pass the ball instead of hogging it?
Image by Flickr User plasticrevolver, cc 2.0
You might think a near financial melt-down would have at least one benefit: a chance to re-boot the regulatory process and start anew. While almost everyone agrees that we need to create a more streamlined and nimble regulatory process, there's little consensus on how to get there. It's kind of like heaven...everyone thinks it's a great place, but no one wants to be the first to go.
To understand the complexity of regulatory reform, check out this Financial Times chart from this morning's edition:
You might think that a dozen or so regulators might be enough to do the job, but evidently not. The "Balkanized" approach to regulation seems ludicrous, but then again, the British have a single watchdog in the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and that didn't stop the mess.
It's about to get even more complicated. Next week, it is expected that Treasury Secretary Geithner will announce that he wants a "Council of Regulators" which will watch over the the newly-anointed systemic risk overseer--the Federal Reserve.
As you review that chart again, think not only about the heads of these agencies fighting for power, relevancy and redemption, remember that each agency has a corresponding lawmaker that oversees it. Rather than work together to improve the system, regulatory reform could become a classic political turf war. The problem is that once someone has the ball, he's reluctant to give it up.
It's just not that easy to fix this mess. We need regulation that fosters free markets, not free-for-all markets. One that monitors systemic risk; ensures the safety and soundness of individual institutions; and oversees business conduct so that investors are protected. Now can someone pass the ball instead of hogging it?
Image by Flickr User plasticrevolver, cc 2.0
-
Jill Schlesinger Jill Schlesinger, CFP®, is the Editor-at-Large for CBS MoneyWatch. She covers the economy, markets, investing or anything else with a dollar sign. Prior to the launch of MoneyWatch in 2009, Jill was the chief investment officer for an independent investment advisory firm. In her infancy, she was an options trader on the Commodities Exchange of New York.
Follow on Twitter »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- LA police search for escapee who stalked Madonna
- Asia stocks slip as Greek bailout remains in limbo
- Asia stocks slip as Greek bailout remains in limbo
- Brazil police strike a danger for Carnival
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
on CBS News






