May 27, 2009 11:57 AM
- Text
GM: Government Motors About to Downshift into Bankruptcy
CBS Radio called at 6am to talk about a possible GM bankruptcy. Possible? On Monday's CBS News Early Show, I said that bankruptcy was a-coming by or on June 1.
The headlines this morning reconfirm that not-so-bold prediction. The government is going to pump another $50 billion into GM, on top of the nearly $20 billion already injected, for a 70 percent stake in the restructured company. That is not a typo -- seventy percent! One radio host asked whether that meant that GM cars would be boring, white sedans created by Uncle Sam's designers. The government maintains that it will not be involved in the day-to-day operations of the company.
The United Automobile Workers (UAW)' health care trust will own 17.5 percent of the company, and warrants equal to another 2.5 percent of GM in the future, in exchange for a bunch of retiree health-care concessions. The ownership position of GM's largest union was lower than many expected. It seems that the union brass realized that maintaining jobs with reduced benefits was better than holding out for more benefits from a broke company.
The missing link in the GM saga is the bondholders. The government will fully repay the $6 billion owed to secured lenders, including Citigroup and J.P. Morgan Chase. But the unsecured bondholders, who hold $27 billion in GM debt, want more than the 10 percent equity stake that the government offered. Bondholders are likely to take their chances in bankruptcy court, where they believe that a judge will be more inclined to recognize the strengths of their contract and case.
If you do the quick math, you realize that current stockholders will be essentially wiped out. What did they expect after GM insiders dumped shares earlier this month?
Will this bankruptcy be a good financial deal for the government? I doubt it. It's rarely profitable to dump money into a money-losing, moribund bureaucratic venture. That said, the government probably figured that the overall psychic cost of letting GM collapse and fizzle out was too great.
The most sobering numbers in this process are the ones that equate to human beings. In 2008, GM had 61,000. The company intends to reduce employment to 38,000 in 2010. 23,000 jobs have vanished and are not coming back.
Government Motors, here we come!
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved. The headlines this morning reconfirm that not-so-bold prediction. The government is going to pump another $50 billion into GM, on top of the nearly $20 billion already injected, for a 70 percent stake in the restructured company. That is not a typo -- seventy percent! One radio host asked whether that meant that GM cars would be boring, white sedans created by Uncle Sam's designers. The government maintains that it will not be involved in the day-to-day operations of the company.
The United Automobile Workers (UAW)' health care trust will own 17.5 percent of the company, and warrants equal to another 2.5 percent of GM in the future, in exchange for a bunch of retiree health-care concessions. The ownership position of GM's largest union was lower than many expected. It seems that the union brass realized that maintaining jobs with reduced benefits was better than holding out for more benefits from a broke company.
The missing link in the GM saga is the bondholders. The government will fully repay the $6 billion owed to secured lenders, including Citigroup and J.P. Morgan Chase. But the unsecured bondholders, who hold $27 billion in GM debt, want more than the 10 percent equity stake that the government offered. Bondholders are likely to take their chances in bankruptcy court, where they believe that a judge will be more inclined to recognize the strengths of their contract and case.
If you do the quick math, you realize that current stockholders will be essentially wiped out. What did they expect after GM insiders dumped shares earlier this month?
Will this bankruptcy be a good financial deal for the government? I doubt it. It's rarely profitable to dump money into a money-losing, moribund bureaucratic venture. That said, the government probably figured that the overall psychic cost of letting GM collapse and fizzle out was too great.
The most sobering numbers in this process are the ones that equate to human beings. In 2008, GM had 61,000. The company intends to reduce employment to 38,000 in 2010. 23,000 jobs have vanished and are not coming back.
Government Motors, here we come!
-
Jill Schlesinger Jill Schlesinger, CFP®, is the Editor-at-Large for CBS MoneyWatch. She covers the economy, markets, investing or anything else with a dollar sign. Prior to the launch of MoneyWatch in 2009, Jill was the chief investment officer for an independent investment advisory firm. In her infancy, she was an options trader on the Commodities Exchange of New York.
Follow on Twitter »
Add A Comment +
Popular Now in MoneyWatch
- 10 Best Countries To Live and Work Abroad
- 4 Things Not to Buy at Costco
- Top 10 Cities for Single Men
- Top 10 Places to Live in 2011
- Analysts: Europe bank run is under way
- Chilean copper giant Codelco CEO resigns
- Used Cars: 5 to Avoid (and 5 Better Alternatives)
- How to handle sexual misconduct at work
- Made in USA: 5 Great American Cars Made Here
- The holy grail of leadership
- Reverse Cell Phone Lookup Service is Free and Simple
- Injury forces Michael McKean out of Broadway show
- Doctors report rise in kids eating detergent packs
- 5 Things You Should Buy at Costco
- Can Tim Cook do what Steve Jobs couldn't?
- FACT CHECK: Romney off on Obama's love for unions






