May 27, 2009 11:57 AM
- Text
GM: Government Motors About to Downshift into Bankruptcy
(MoneyWatch) CBS Radio called at 6am to talk about a possible GM bankruptcy. Possible? On Monday's CBS News Early Show, I said that bankruptcy was a-coming by or on June 1.
The headlines this morning reconfirm that not-so-bold prediction. The government is going to pump another $50 billion into GM, on top of the nearly $20 billion already injected, for a 70 percent stake in the restructured company. That is not a typo -- seventy percent! One radio host asked whether that meant that GM cars would be boring, white sedans created by Uncle Sam's designers. The government maintains that it will not be involved in the day-to-day operations of the company.
The United Automobile Workers (UAW)' health care trust will own 17.5 percent of the company, and warrants equal to another 2.5 percent of GM in the future, in exchange for a bunch of retiree health-care concessions. The ownership position of GM's largest union was lower than many expected. It seems that the union brass realized that maintaining jobs with reduced benefits was better than holding out for more benefits from a broke company.
The missing link in the GM saga is the bondholders. The government will fully repay the $6 billion owed to secured lenders, including Citigroup and J.P. Morgan Chase. But the unsecured bondholders, who hold $27 billion in GM debt, want more than the 10 percent equity stake that the government offered. Bondholders are likely to take their chances in bankruptcy court, where they believe that a judge will be more inclined to recognize the strengths of their contract and case.
If you do the quick math, you realize that current stockholders will be essentially wiped out. What did they expect after GM insiders dumped shares earlier this month?
Will this bankruptcy be a good financial deal for the government? I doubt it. It's rarely profitable to dump money into a money-losing, moribund bureaucratic venture. That said, the government probably figured that the overall psychic cost of letting GM collapse and fizzle out was too great.
The most sobering numbers in this process are the ones that equate to human beings. In 2008, GM had 61,000. The company intends to reduce employment to 38,000 in 2010. 23,000 jobs have vanished and are not coming back.
Government Motors, here we come!
The headlines this morning reconfirm that not-so-bold prediction. The government is going to pump another $50 billion into GM, on top of the nearly $20 billion already injected, for a 70 percent stake in the restructured company. That is not a typo -- seventy percent! One radio host asked whether that meant that GM cars would be boring, white sedans created by Uncle Sam's designers. The government maintains that it will not be involved in the day-to-day operations of the company.
The United Automobile Workers (UAW)' health care trust will own 17.5 percent of the company, and warrants equal to another 2.5 percent of GM in the future, in exchange for a bunch of retiree health-care concessions. The ownership position of GM's largest union was lower than many expected. It seems that the union brass realized that maintaining jobs with reduced benefits was better than holding out for more benefits from a broke company.
The missing link in the GM saga is the bondholders. The government will fully repay the $6 billion owed to secured lenders, including Citigroup and J.P. Morgan Chase. But the unsecured bondholders, who hold $27 billion in GM debt, want more than the 10 percent equity stake that the government offered. Bondholders are likely to take their chances in bankruptcy court, where they believe that a judge will be more inclined to recognize the strengths of their contract and case.
If you do the quick math, you realize that current stockholders will be essentially wiped out. What did they expect after GM insiders dumped shares earlier this month?
Will this bankruptcy be a good financial deal for the government? I doubt it. It's rarely profitable to dump money into a money-losing, moribund bureaucratic venture. That said, the government probably figured that the overall psychic cost of letting GM collapse and fizzle out was too great.
The most sobering numbers in this process are the ones that equate to human beings. In 2008, GM had 61,000. The company intends to reduce employment to 38,000 in 2010. 23,000 jobs have vanished and are not coming back.
Government Motors, here we come!
-
Jill Schlesinger Jill Schlesinger, CFP®, is the Editor-at-Large for CBS MoneyWatch. She covers the economy, markets, investing or anything else with a dollar sign. Prior to the launch of MoneyWatch in 2009, Jill was the chief investment officer for an independent investment advisory firm. In her infancy, she was an options trader on the Commodities Exchange of New York.
Follow on Twitter »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Skaters still hold hope for Dutch skating marathon
- Serbia urges citizens to save power in big freeze
- Drama, intrigue mark Grammys run-up
- Famed Spain judge convicted of misusing authority
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
on CBS News






