- Text
How Bulls and Bears Affect Your Investment Plan
Consider a couple in their early 50s as we entered the 1990s. They had accumulated a significant amount of wealth and were well on the way to achieving their financial goals. Their plan called for an equity/fixed income allocation of 70/30. This allocation was based on the assumption that stocks would provide returns of 10 percent a year and five-year Treasury bonds would return 8 percent. (As hard as it may be to believe, that was the current yield at the time.) Thus, the expected return of the portfolio was 9.4 percent.
At the end of the decade, they found that their portfolio* had actually returned 14.9 percent, and they were now much closer to their goals than expected. Thus, they could lower their equity allocation. (Note that a bear market would have produced the reverse outcome. They would have been further from their goal, and it's likely they would have needed to increase their equity allocation accordingly.) On the other hand, the bull market of the 1990s was (from an investment standpoint) the worst thing that could have happened to younger people as it lowered future expected returns for both stocks and bonds.
Those who appropriately lowered their equity allocations (due to their lower need to take risk) after the strong markets of the 1990s or after the good run from 2003-06 were much better positioned when the bear markets of 2000-02 and 2008 occurred. Their losses were much lower than they would have been had they simply bought and held (and even rebalanced).
Investment plans are based on certain assumptions. Thus, it's only logical that if any of the assumptions on which the plan was based have changed, that the plan should also be changed to adapt to the new circumstances. As we have seen, it's not only life events that can cause the plan to change, but significant bull and bear markets can also cause the assumptions upon which the plan was based to change. Thus, it's clear that a passive investment approach should only be adopted in terms of avoiding active management strategies. And it's important to recognize that you should be active in terms of:
- Managing the plan, making sure you don't allow market movements to cause your portfolio to drift away from its desired allocations.
- Tax managing the portfolio throughout the year.
- Adapting the plan to account for changes in expected returns if they impact your need to take risk.
-
Larry Swedroe Larry Swedroe is a principal and the director of research for The Buckingham Family of Financial Services, comprised of Buckingham Asset Management, LLC, BAM Risk Management, LLC and BAM Advisor Services, LLC (and its network of independent registered investment advisor firms). He has authored or co-authored 10 books, including his most recent, The Quest For Alpha. Follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/larryswedroe. His opinions and comments expressed on this site are his own and may not accurately reflect those of the firm.
- Jobs up, unemployment down, stocks soar
- Apple, Motorola in patent duel in Germany
- Beyonce headed to "X-Factor?"
- You can't judge DFA advisors off fund returns
- Post-crisis high for U.S. stocks
- Micron CEO Steve Appleton dies in plane crash
- Parents: Would you quit your job to save on childcare?
- Will job numbers help Obama?
- The super homes of Super Bowl greats
- Factory orders up 1.1 percent in December
- Cut the Super Bowl XLVI cable cord
- Obama outlines veterans jobs programs
- 'Why is my bill rate so much higher than my pay?'
- Unemployment down to 8.3 percent
- Win big deals without being lucky
- U.S. unemployment falls to 8.3%
- January jobs: Finally, a great report
- Charges dropped against soldier in Afghan deaths
- Recall news
- Ohio bill would ban new ownership of exotic pets
- Calif. pulls builder's license after worker killed
on Facebook
- Susan G. Komen reverses course, will keep funding Planned Parenthood
- 25 drunkest countries in the world
- "Person to Person": Iconic images
- Demi Moore visited by Bruce Willis, Ashton Kutcher: Report
on CBS News






