July 27, 2010 9:30 PM
- Text
What Does Business Week Call "America's Worst Investment"?
(MoneyWatch) If you've been considering making an investment in a commodity-related ETF, the cover story of this week's edition of Business Week might make you think twice.
So what is it about these funds that's led the magazine to call them "America's Worst Investment"? The authors focus in on the U.S. Oil Fund, which is designed to track the spot price of light, sweet crude. But the fund has had a difficult time doing so. As the authors note, since its April 2006 launch, the fund has lost 50 percent, while the price of crude has climbed 11 percent.
The reasons for this jaw-dropping spread are detailed in the article, which is well worth a read.
The problems highlighted there are just the most recent manifestation of a problem that's plagued the mutual fund industry for decades: fund marketers racing to meet investor demand with a host of products designed to capitalize on what's hot.
As the ETF industry took off over the past few years, fund managers raced one another to be the first to offer funds that tracked smaller and smaller niches of the investment universe. And as those funds were brought out, little time was spent considering whether or not some of the smaller corners of the investment world were ready for prime time.
Clearly, some were not. As commodity prices around the globe took off in 2006-2007, investors fell all over themselves attempting to get a piece of the action, pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into areas of the markets that had heretofore been dominated by a relative handful of highly specialized investors.
The result, as the article notes, is that "Wall Street banks are transferring wealth from their clients to their trading desks."
As my Moneywatch colleague Larry Swedroe has pointed out, a small allocation to a broad basket of commodities may help improve a portfolio's diversification. But with ETFs tracking coffee, sugar, tin, heating oil and more, it's difficult to imagine that the majority of investors are using those funds to further diversify a prudently constructed portfolio. Instead, it seems that they're being used to bet on hunches.
If you have the urge to place a bet, by all means go ahead and do so. But before doing so, make sure that your bet on the nickel market doesn't end up putting a significant dent in your retirement outlook.
So what is it about these funds that's led the magazine to call them "America's Worst Investment"? The authors focus in on the U.S. Oil Fund, which is designed to track the spot price of light, sweet crude. But the fund has had a difficult time doing so. As the authors note, since its April 2006 launch, the fund has lost 50 percent, while the price of crude has climbed 11 percent.
The reasons for this jaw-dropping spread are detailed in the article, which is well worth a read.
The problems highlighted there are just the most recent manifestation of a problem that's plagued the mutual fund industry for decades: fund marketers racing to meet investor demand with a host of products designed to capitalize on what's hot.
As the ETF industry took off over the past few years, fund managers raced one another to be the first to offer funds that tracked smaller and smaller niches of the investment universe. And as those funds were brought out, little time was spent considering whether or not some of the smaller corners of the investment world were ready for prime time.
Clearly, some were not. As commodity prices around the globe took off in 2006-2007, investors fell all over themselves attempting to get a piece of the action, pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into areas of the markets that had heretofore been dominated by a relative handful of highly specialized investors.
The result, as the article notes, is that "Wall Street banks are transferring wealth from their clients to their trading desks."
As my Moneywatch colleague Larry Swedroe has pointed out, a small allocation to a broad basket of commodities may help improve a portfolio's diversification. But with ETFs tracking coffee, sugar, tin, heating oil and more, it's difficult to imagine that the majority of investors are using those funds to further diversify a prudently constructed portfolio. Instead, it seems that they're being used to bet on hunches.
If you have the urge to place a bet, by all means go ahead and do so. But before doing so, make sure that your bet on the nickel market doesn't end up putting a significant dent in your retirement outlook.
-
Nathan Hale Nathan Hale has spent decades working in the financial services industry, during which he has researched and written extensively about personal investing, the mutual fund industry, and financial services. In this role, he uses a nom de plume because many of his opinions about the mutual fund industry and its practices would not endear him to its participants.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- GreenCloud saves paper, toner, money and time
- Obama plan for manufacturing revival a tough sell
- Leadership lessons from Alaska Airlines
- Foreclosure pact: Enough help for homeowners?
- EU: Greece must cut deeper to get bailout
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Romney seeks conservative connection at CPAC
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
on Facebook
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- "Person to Person" with George Clooney
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
on CBS News






