Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
April 8, 2009 1:17 PM

The Geithner Plan: An End Run Around Congress

By
Tyler Cowen
(MoneyWatch)  I have been worried about the possibility of private sector manipulation in the Geithner plan, as outlined by Jeff Sachs and others. I'd like to make sure the plan is protected from the worst of these outcomes.

But overall I have been influenced by many of your arguments on this policy. For one thing, I haven't been able to come up with a better idea and if we do nothing the government is already on the hook for all or most of the liabilities of the banking system.

Everyone is writing about how private banks might game the Geithner plan, but I should add that the plan is an instance of President Obama gaming Congress. In essence, the FDIC is adding leverage to the American economy without receiving any additional Congressional approval. There is always a chance that leverage goes bad and someone has to come up with the money. As with quantitative easing (i.e., have the Fed buy up lots of exotic assets with newly created money), the government is running a kind of implicit fiscal policy without getting formal approval of Congress.

Don't get me wrong -- I have much more faith in the Obama administration, the FDIC, and the Fed than I do in Congress. But I wonder where this process will stop and at what point it becomes unhealthy or perhaps even verging on unconstitutional.

The sad thing is this: maybe Congress prefers not to be directly responsible for much of what is going on.

Follow Blog War over the federal stimulus package:

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved.
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook