July 6, 2009 6:22 AM
- Text
Murtha Turns Negative?
(MoneyWatch) Congressman John Murtha (D-PA) who has made a career out of using the defense budget to fund companies and jobs in his district gave an interview two weeks ago where he expressed concern about support for defense spending in the U.S. Congress. He believes that the Congress may end up turning their backs on the U.S. military.
He seems to be basing this negative opinion on the struggle in the House to get the last Defense Supplemental Bill passed. The Obama Administration claims that they will no longer request these to support continuing operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. The proposed 2010 budget contains the planned funding for these right now.
The reason the House Bill was close was that the Republicans fought it for all of the non-Defense spending added to it. Some liberal Democratic members were upset that there was no time line for ending operations in Afghanistan now that it seems the war is winding down in Iraq with the movement of U.S. troops out of the major cities. Obama is claiming this represents the first step in moving all of the troops out of Iraq. Some liberal peace hawks, like Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), aren't buying that claiming this movement is not a withdrawal, really just a redistribution of troops.
Murtha's belief is unfounded at this time. Congress will pass most of the bill submitted by the President. Right now the fights between him and Congress are over keeping big ticket production items going; not on the total amount of spending or the need for it. Murtha has used the defense budget to add money and items not necessarily requested by the military. If he remains in his powerful post he will be able to keep doing so and add to the defense budget if he desires.
Murtha does believe it will be hard to pass another supplemental for Iraq and Afghanistan if required. If it is it really is the fault of Obama and not Congress. He is the one promising no more of these types of bills, if he had not made that promise during the campaign he would not be limited in his options. Honestly right now the way things are going the 2010 elections will not favor the Democrats in the House and it may be that Murtha won't have to worry about this kind of thing. There is also the ongoing PMA investigation that also will help him in his future career decisions. One hopes at least.
He seems to be basing this negative opinion on the struggle in the House to get the last Defense Supplemental Bill passed. The Obama Administration claims that they will no longer request these to support continuing operations in Afghanistan and Iraq. The proposed 2010 budget contains the planned funding for these right now.
The reason the House Bill was close was that the Republicans fought it for all of the non-Defense spending added to it. Some liberal Democratic members were upset that there was no time line for ending operations in Afghanistan now that it seems the war is winding down in Iraq with the movement of U.S. troops out of the major cities. Obama is claiming this represents the first step in moving all of the troops out of Iraq. Some liberal peace hawks, like Congressman Dennis Kucinich (D-OH), aren't buying that claiming this movement is not a withdrawal, really just a redistribution of troops.
Murtha's belief is unfounded at this time. Congress will pass most of the bill submitted by the President. Right now the fights between him and Congress are over keeping big ticket production items going; not on the total amount of spending or the need for it. Murtha has used the defense budget to add money and items not necessarily requested by the military. If he remains in his powerful post he will be able to keep doing so and add to the defense budget if he desires.
Murtha does believe it will be hard to pass another supplemental for Iraq and Afghanistan if required. If it is it really is the fault of Obama and not Congress. He is the one promising no more of these types of bills, if he had not made that promise during the campaign he would not be limited in his options. Honestly right now the way things are going the 2010 elections will not favor the Democrats in the House and it may be that Murtha won't have to worry about this kind of thing. There is also the ongoing PMA investigation that also will help him in his future career decisions. One hopes at least.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Repsol YPF begins to drill for oil, gas in Guyana
- Mets owners ask high court for help in Madoff case
- Civilians bear the brunt of Syrian assault
- Spirit challenges American in the heart of Texas
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
on CBS News






