June 19, 2009 5:58 AM
- Text
Fighting Over Natural Resources To Balance Your Budget
(MoneyWatch) Some nations and regions are blessed with possessing valuable natural resources like oil or natural gas. This has led to those areas to use the revenue to prop up and balance their budget. In the United Kingdom Scotland is the main production area for oil thanks to the deposits in the North Sea. In America it is Alaska that benefits from this.
Other states such as those that border the Gulf of Mexico do make money off of the various oil and gas leases sold in the past. Alabama for one put the money it earned from the leases in the Eighties into a trust and uses the interest for state spending. Alaska for 2009 projects oil revenue of over $5 billion dollars. This was a fall from the estimate previously of almost $7 billion due to a drop in the price of a barrel of oil. This money supports the state and local budgets as well as being sent to every state resident.
In Scotland there was recently a spat between that partially independent country and the English government over oil and tax revenue. Scottish politicians have proposed splitting the revenue from its production based on their relative sizes rather then the current system of receiving money from the government in the form of a grant. The goal is to move to a system more like Alaska's and also to receive more funds.
As part of this argument the Scottish Government has put out reports showing that with access to most of the revenue related to the oil production from the North Sea that they would have a surplus. Currently they like the national government are running a large deficit. These figures are disputed by other economists and the U.K.'s government. Of course both sides are going to do this to bolster their arguments to keep as much of the revenue as possible.
In America there has been a push to reopen the Gulf and the East and West Coasts to more drilling. This has been long frozen due to environmental concerns. The states bordering these waters, especially in the South, desire the new drilling for the revenue it will provide. The United States probably could use more domestic oil and gas production to offset the higher prices of imported oil but the political compromise will be hard to reach.
As the Scottish example shows that rich natural resources concentrated in one area may lead to schism within a country as they try to best figure out how to properly divide this money. As there continues to be pressure on all government budgets and funding there will be a continued push to develop domestic sources as part of a way to increase tax revenue.
Other states such as those that border the Gulf of Mexico do make money off of the various oil and gas leases sold in the past. Alabama for one put the money it earned from the leases in the Eighties into a trust and uses the interest for state spending. Alaska for 2009 projects oil revenue of over $5 billion dollars. This was a fall from the estimate previously of almost $7 billion due to a drop in the price of a barrel of oil. This money supports the state and local budgets as well as being sent to every state resident.
In Scotland there was recently a spat between that partially independent country and the English government over oil and tax revenue. Scottish politicians have proposed splitting the revenue from its production based on their relative sizes rather then the current system of receiving money from the government in the form of a grant. The goal is to move to a system more like Alaska's and also to receive more funds.
As part of this argument the Scottish Government has put out reports showing that with access to most of the revenue related to the oil production from the North Sea that they would have a surplus. Currently they like the national government are running a large deficit. These figures are disputed by other economists and the U.K.'s government. Of course both sides are going to do this to bolster their arguments to keep as much of the revenue as possible.
In America there has been a push to reopen the Gulf and the East and West Coasts to more drilling. This has been long frozen due to environmental concerns. The states bordering these waters, especially in the South, desire the new drilling for the revenue it will provide. The United States probably could use more domestic oil and gas production to offset the higher prices of imported oil but the political compromise will be hard to reach.
As the Scottish example shows that rich natural resources concentrated in one area may lead to schism within a country as they try to best figure out how to properly divide this money. As there continues to be pressure on all government budgets and funding there will be a continued push to develop domestic sources as part of a way to increase tax revenue.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Lin scores 38 to lead Knicks over Lakers 92-85
- Mavericks hold off T-wolves 104-97 behind Nowitzki
- Crawford leads Trail Blazers past Hornets, 94-86
- Jennings' 24 lifts Bucks past Cavs 113-112 in OT
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






