November 13, 2008 7:34 PM
- Text
Small Businesses and Defense Contracts
(MoneyWatch) The Washington Post recently conducted an analysis of contract awards to small businesses by the US Department of Defense. As reported they found that many contracts were awarded to companies that were characterized as small. Congress has set requirements for the Department to award a certain percentage of their contracts to small business. The general gist as to why this is happening is that the government is lazy and looking for the path of least resistance in awarding the contracts. Many times they companies were subsidiaries of bigger companies.
In a related article, WashingtonTechnology.com, writes of a study conducted by RAND about the requirements to award to small businesses and ways to make it easier. RAND is a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) that does a lot of work for the Air Force. One of their major recommendations is that the definition of a small company be raised to allow bigger companies. One of the things that the Washington Post did point out is that their is no consistent definition of what is a small business in the Federal Government; so coming up with a consistent one would perhaps would be a better first step. Obviously Congress' goal in this is so that a few large companies don't dominate the contracts awarded. More on this to come I am sure.
In a related article, WashingtonTechnology.com, writes of a study conducted by RAND about the requirements to award to small businesses and ways to make it easier. RAND is a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) that does a lot of work for the Air Force. One of their major recommendations is that the definition of a small company be raised to allow bigger companies. One of the things that the Washington Post did point out is that their is no consistent definition of what is a small business in the Federal Government; so coming up with a consistent one would perhaps would be a better first step. Obviously Congress' goal in this is so that a few large companies don't dominate the contracts awarded. More on this to come I am sure.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Heels so high, sometimes the models fall down
- La Scala dancers deny anorexia emergency
- Heels so high, sometimes the models fall down
- La Scala dancers deny anorexia emergency
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






