August 27, 2009 7:05 AM
- Text
PG&E Pursuing a Grant For Wind Turbine Energy Storage
(MoneyWatch)
Pacific Gas & Electric sure does love to keep up its reputation as the first to try out any new technology. Usually it's just some form of renewable -- wave turbines, space-based solar, and so forth. Today they have a new spin: compressed air storage for wind turbines.
If that conjures the image of turbines filling up a giant balloon, you're not too far off, although the particular balloon being used isn't elastic. Compressed air works best with pre-existing caves that have proven to be well sealed, like those that natural gas is sometimes found in. Whenever there's excess power coming from the turbines, air is pumped into the cave. When power is needed, heat is applied to make the air expand and blow out.
There are already a couple caves being used that way. One in Germany has been operating since the 1970s, and another in Alabama since the early 1990s. But the technology hasn't gotten too much attention until recently, when some entrepreneurs started working to update it.
Covering the news, the San Jose Mercury points out that the American Wind Energy Association would prefer to skip energy storage for the time being in favor of building cross-country transmission to take wind power where it's needed.
PG&E doesn't agree, because it will take time to build the transmission, and many projects are still up in the air. To that, I'd add another objection: The United States doesn't span enough time zones to make a strong wind at 1am in Ohio or Oklahoma useful anywhere else, especially as we erect ever more turbines. Storage will be useful, if it can be done economically.
Projections have suggested that compressed air might add only a few cents to the price of wind power, which is pretty good considering that the evening wind more or less goes to waste. But PG&E's project would be the first to nail down a figure. At the moment, they're saying 300 megawatts of storage in Kern County, California will cost $356 million, requiring an initial $25 million Federal grant for study.
In its blog post on the idea, PG&E didn't mention who it might work with. But to my knowledge, there's only one significantly-funded startup pursuing air compression. Energy Storage and Power took about $20 million last year from PSEG Energy Holdings, a subsidiary of the New Jersey utility Public Service Electric and Gas Company. That's a pretty good bona fide for working with PG&E.
Pacific Gas & Electric sure does love to keep up its reputation as the first to try out any new technology. Usually it's just some form of renewable -- wave turbines, space-based solar, and so forth. Today they have a new spin: compressed air storage for wind turbines.If that conjures the image of turbines filling up a giant balloon, you're not too far off, although the particular balloon being used isn't elastic. Compressed air works best with pre-existing caves that have proven to be well sealed, like those that natural gas is sometimes found in. Whenever there's excess power coming from the turbines, air is pumped into the cave. When power is needed, heat is applied to make the air expand and blow out.
There are already a couple caves being used that way. One in Germany has been operating since the 1970s, and another in Alabama since the early 1990s. But the technology hasn't gotten too much attention until recently, when some entrepreneurs started working to update it.
Covering the news, the San Jose Mercury points out that the American Wind Energy Association would prefer to skip energy storage for the time being in favor of building cross-country transmission to take wind power where it's needed.
PG&E doesn't agree, because it will take time to build the transmission, and many projects are still up in the air. To that, I'd add another objection: The United States doesn't span enough time zones to make a strong wind at 1am in Ohio or Oklahoma useful anywhere else, especially as we erect ever more turbines. Storage will be useful, if it can be done economically.
Projections have suggested that compressed air might add only a few cents to the price of wind power, which is pretty good considering that the evening wind more or less goes to waste. But PG&E's project would be the first to nail down a figure. At the moment, they're saying 300 megawatts of storage in Kern County, California will cost $356 million, requiring an initial $25 million Federal grant for study.
In its blog post on the idea, PG&E didn't mention who it might work with. But to my knowledge, there's only one significantly-funded startup pursuing air compression. Energy Storage and Power took about $20 million last year from PSEG Energy Holdings, a subsidiary of the New Jersey utility Public Service Electric and Gas Company. That's a pretty good bona fide for working with PG&E.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Rag & Bone show: From Brit roots to Asia
- Rag & Bone show: From Brit roots to Asia
- Nicole Miller mixes '70s rocker and digital prints
- Nicole Miller mixes '70s rocker and digital prints
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Timothy Dolan: Birth control tweak a "first step"
on CBS News






