May 15, 2009 6:51 PM
- Text
Offbeat Ideas Make Wind Turbines Cheaper
(MoneyWatch) A popular refrain among venture capitalists investing in clean technologies is that they won't touch wind because it's a "mature" technology. Despite that view, the industry is still figuring out improvements on a fairly regular basis.
By "improvements" I don't mean oddball ideas like the Maglev Wind Turbine or designer Philippe Starck's stylish home turbine. Such creativity will inevitably run into the iron rule of energy: It must be cost-effective compared to existing technology. That said, I've seen a few ideas pop up this week with an eye to improving the costs of existing tech.
The first is simply adding some height to turbine towers. Wind at higher altitudes tends to be stronger. Raising taller turbines also increases the stresses on the tower, thus complicating construction, but a German company called Advanced Tower Systems has figured out a system combining pre-fabricated concrete and steel that may do the trick. By adding over a hundred feet to a typical hub height of 328 feet, ATS says it can increase energy yields by 20 percent.
An alternate idea is to keep towers lower to the ground, but add equipment that directs more wind to the turbines. That's what Leviathan Energy plans to do with its "Wind Energizer", a structure set around the base of a turbine that re-directs wind that would have passed below the turbine up towards it. Leviathan is beginning sales of the Energizer in the United States, although like ATS, its product will require testing.
Vestas, on the other hand, isn't trying to improve the operation of turbines with its Vestas Tower Crane, but instead to reduce maintenance costs. Instead of extending from the ground, the VTC clamps itself to the hub and crawls upwards to make repairs. Current cranes have to stop work in high wind -- a
bit of a problem in the windy areas preferred for turbines. Maintenance does add significantly to costs over time, so a better crane could be important in the long run.
Of course, there may still be room for big leaps and odd ideas. Makani Power, for example, gave a talk today about its technology, essentially a giant kite tethered to a generator that flies at an altitude far above what terrestrial turbines can achieve. Makani has been hard at work for several years without saying much at all, but it's unlikely Google.org would have invested in the company if there weren't something to it.
By "improvements" I don't mean oddball ideas like the Maglev Wind Turbine or designer Philippe Starck's stylish home turbine. Such creativity will inevitably run into the iron rule of energy: It must be cost-effective compared to existing technology. That said, I've seen a few ideas pop up this week with an eye to improving the costs of existing tech.
The first is simply adding some height to turbine towers. Wind at higher altitudes tends to be stronger. Raising taller turbines also increases the stresses on the tower, thus complicating construction, but a German company called Advanced Tower Systems has figured out a system combining pre-fabricated concrete and steel that may do the trick. By adding over a hundred feet to a typical hub height of 328 feet, ATS says it can increase energy yields by 20 percent.An alternate idea is to keep towers lower to the ground, but add equipment that directs more wind to the turbines. That's what Leviathan Energy plans to do with its "Wind Energizer", a structure set around the base of a turbine that re-directs wind that would have passed below the turbine up towards it. Leviathan is beginning sales of the Energizer in the United States, although like ATS, its product will require testing.
Vestas, on the other hand, isn't trying to improve the operation of turbines with its Vestas Tower Crane, but instead to reduce maintenance costs. Instead of extending from the ground, the VTC clamps itself to the hub and crawls upwards to make repairs. Current cranes have to stop work in high wind -- a
bit of a problem in the windy areas preferred for turbines. Maintenance does add significantly to costs over time, so a better crane could be important in the long run.Of course, there may still be room for big leaps and odd ideas. Makani Power, for example, gave a talk today about its technology, essentially a giant kite tethered to a generator that flies at an altitude far above what terrestrial turbines can achieve. Makani has been hard at work for several years without saying much at all, but it's unlikely Google.org would have invested in the company if there weren't something to it.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Cold weather returns to the South; snow possible
- State senator, wife, attacked at western NY casino
- Hundreds gather in Kansas to remember oldest judge
- King memorial group head angry at monument change
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






