January 27, 2009 10:19 AM
- Text
Could the Recession Kill Obama's Alternative Energy Package?
(MoneyWatch) An interesting item running in 24/7 Wall St. today, and reprinted in Time, has some scary thoughts for alternative energy mavens. In a nutshell, the argument is that the recession could rapidly worsen to the point that the entire bailout package, which includes funds for energy, broadband and other measures, needs to be diverted to staunch the bleeding.
The title of the piece is "Creating Jobs Trumps Building Bridges," but you could effectively replace "building bridges" with any other important infrastructure project. The article appears to have been spurred by yesterday's announcement that a handful of big firms including Caterpillar and General Motors had axed over 75,000 employees. Here's a bit of it:
If that happens, the calls will rise for immediate, on-the-spot action -- to the loss of everything else.
The title of the piece is "Creating Jobs Trumps Building Bridges," but you could effectively replace "building bridges" with any other important infrastructure project. The article appears to have been spurred by yesterday's announcement that a handful of big firms including Caterpillar and General Motors had axed over 75,000 employees. Here's a bit of it:
There is a powerful argument that the number of people unemployed in the United States could rise by more than 2.5 million people in the first quarter based on the current job situation.. The case that no one wants to mention is that the figure could move above three million.Indeed, the basis for the bailout is that we're on the low end of a pendulum swing, poised to skim along at the same level for a while before starting to rise back up in 2010. If 24/7 is right, the bob of the pendulum has slipped off the rod and gone flying toward the floor. A loss of over three million jobs this quarter would do terrible damage to the economy.
The economic stimulus bill which should get to the president's desk in a month is meant to save or create 3 million to 4 million jobs over the next 2 years. That is impossible. The unemployment hole is getting too big too fast...
Tax cuts and rebates are not incentives, at least in an economy that is sinking this fast. The money takes too long to get from the government to the business operator. The system needs something more direct ... The single most direct option is for the government to pay a portion of the salary of each net new employee a company hires.
If that happens, the calls will rise for immediate, on-the-spot action -- to the loss of everything else.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Mexican army finds 15 tons of pure methamphetamine
- Mexico party rally ends with 650 food-poison cases
- Mexican army finds 15 tons of pure methamphetamine
- UN backs Haitians' appeal over Duvalier trial
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






