October 7, 2008 12:45 PM
- Text
Shell to Get First Slice of Iraq Energy Business
(MoneyWatch) Amid cries of protest from antiwar groups and senior Iraqis, Royal Dutch Shell and the Iraqi government recently signed a deal that will enable Shell to supply liquefied natural gas (LNG) to local markets and probably to Britain as well. This is only the second deal of this magnitude involving a foreign company since the invasion of Iraq in 2003, and the first time since 1973 that a Western energy company has gotten a significant slice of Iraq's huge energy pie since the 1970s.
The deal gives Shell, under a joint venture with Iraq's South Gas Company, the right to drill and produce natural gas from the Basra region in return for a $4 billion investment. That's pretty small change for Shell given that the investment could be worth ten times that or more in years to come. The South Gas Company and Shell respectively hold 51 percent and 49 percent stakes in the venture.
So, why the protest? The main reason is that there was no competitive-tendering process for this deal, fueling the deeply held suspicion among antiwar groups that the war was fought for oil in the first place. Senior Iraqis are also rankled by the possibility that Shell got the job too cheaply. In any case, the deal is done, and with luck some of the wealth generated by the venture will filter to the local economy.
This is by no means the end of such dealmaking. An October 13 meeting in London involving the Iraqi Oil Ministry will doubtless mean major contracts for major energy companies -- especially those that hail from nations that supported U.S. efforts in Iraq. As the old maxim has it, "you have to be in it to win it."
The deal gives Shell, under a joint venture with Iraq's South Gas Company, the right to drill and produce natural gas from the Basra region in return for a $4 billion investment. That's pretty small change for Shell given that the investment could be worth ten times that or more in years to come. The South Gas Company and Shell respectively hold 51 percent and 49 percent stakes in the venture.
So, why the protest? The main reason is that there was no competitive-tendering process for this deal, fueling the deeply held suspicion among antiwar groups that the war was fought for oil in the first place. Senior Iraqis are also rankled by the possibility that Shell got the job too cheaply. In any case, the deal is done, and with luck some of the wealth generated by the venture will filter to the local economy.
This is by no means the end of such dealmaking. An October 13 meeting in London involving the Iraqi Oil Ministry will doubtless mean major contracts for major energy companies -- especially those that hail from nations that supported U.S. efforts in Iraq. As the old maxim has it, "you have to be in it to win it."
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Wash. moves step closer to legalizing gay marriage
- Air Force trains flight attendants for VIP trips
- Item in Powell unit tests positive for blood
- Video: Man tries to carry girl away at Ga. Walmart
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
on CBS News






