January 22, 2010 10:11 AM
- Text
Somaxon Pharmaceuticals Nearing End of FDA Fatigue for Silenor?
(MoneyWatch)
Somaxon Pharmaceuticals said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration accepted the resubmission of the new drug application for Silenor (doxepin), its investigational treatment for insomnia, as a complete Class 1 response. Although not an approvable action letter, this move does signal receptiveness by health regulators to complete the drug review within a 60-day period.
As companies -- including Somaxon (NASDQ:SOMX) -- do not disclose contents of complete-response letters, it is difficult to interpret the material intentions of the FDA. Nonetheless, Class 1 resubmissions typically address just small deficiencies in the application, such as labeling or a minor re-analysis of previously submitted data to the application, according to Center for Drug Evaluation and Research procedures.
Understandably, chief executive Richard Pascoe could not discuss with me anything beyond what was stated in the press release. That said, he did confirm that regulators did not raise any new issues or concerns. In my opinion, both parties will likely go one more round -- wrangling over a minor efficacy endpoint (in my opinion): the robustness of sustained subjective sleep maintenance efficacy in non-elderly adults with primary insomnia.
Commenting on the pharmacological management of insomnia (Drug Benefit Trends. 2009;21:266-271) Dr. David N. Neubauer, associate director of the Johns Hopkins Sleep Disorders Center, wrote:
Related Posts:
Somaxon Pharmaceuticals said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration accepted the resubmission of the new drug application for Silenor (doxepin), its investigational treatment for insomnia, as a complete Class 1 response. Although not an approvable action letter, this move does signal receptiveness by health regulators to complete the drug review within a 60-day period. As companies -- including Somaxon (NASDQ:SOMX) -- do not disclose contents of complete-response letters, it is difficult to interpret the material intentions of the FDA. Nonetheless, Class 1 resubmissions typically address just small deficiencies in the application, such as labeling or a minor re-analysis of previously submitted data to the application, according to Center for Drug Evaluation and Research procedures.
Understandably, chief executive Richard Pascoe could not discuss with me anything beyond what was stated in the press release. That said, he did confirm that regulators did not raise any new issues or concerns. In my opinion, both parties will likely go one more round -- wrangling over a minor efficacy endpoint (in my opinion): the robustness of sustained subjective sleep maintenance efficacy in non-elderly adults with primary insomnia.
Commenting on the pharmacological management of insomnia (Drug Benefit Trends. 2009;21:266-271) Dr. David N. Neubauer, associate director of the Johns Hopkins Sleep Disorders Center, wrote:
The challenge for the future will continue to be the optimization of efficacy and safety in the promotion of nighttime sleep and daytime functioning. Improvement in the quality of life for insomnia sufferers must be the ultimate goal.Looking to cut through all the regulatory ambiguities, I asked Dr. Neubauer to opine on the potential merits of Silenor as a drug treatment for insomnia:
None of us are privy to the FDA communications with Somaxon, so we can only speculate.... The low-dose doxepin studies generally have demonstrated reasonable efficacy, particularly for sleep maintenence (and uniquely for the final 1/3 of the night). Although there are well-known safety concerns with doxepin at standard doses, the very low Silenor doses should be very safe. At these doses the main pharmacodynamic activity should only be the desired sedating antihistamine effect. While a doxepin overdose could be fatal, it would be hard to do with 3 and 6 mg pills. There should be no abuse potential, since this does not exist at higher dose.Somaxon, which received a second complete-response letter from FDA in December, anticipates a decision from the FDA by March 21, 2010.
Rebound insomnia should not occur, but even if it did that shouldn't be a major problem as most of the currently approved insomnia medications have some degree of rebound insomnia. I don't believe that Silenor was associated with any significant degree of next-day fatigue or sleepiness.
Related Posts:
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Al-Qaida chief urges outside help for Syria rebels
- Saudi Mobily secures $2.7B Islamic loan
- Militants decry attacks against Pakistani military
- Boeing says it's frustrated with Dreamliner glitch
on Facebook
- Whitney Houston 1963-2012
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- "Phantom" star sings on "CBS This Morning: Saturday"
on CBS News






