May 6, 2008 9:19 AM
- Text
Emergent's Vaccine Play: Biotech Can Flip-Flop, Too
(MoneyWatch)
For sudden twists of fate, abrupt collapses and the occasional stunning revival, it's hard to beat the biotech industry. Yesterday, for instance, the all-but-dead biotech VaxGen agreed to sell off its ailing anthrax vaccine to its East Coast rival Emergent BioSolutions --a company that spent much of this decade trying to lobby VaxGen out of existence.
Formerly known as BioPort, Emergent makes the anthrax vaccine currently used by the U.S. military, although that product is slow, inconvenient, and potentially prone to side effects. In 2004, the government awarded VaxGen a sole-source contract to product a new vaccine that would require fewer shots and work faster, agreeing to pay the company $877.5 million for the work. Emergent expressed its displeasure by spending millions on lobbyists to convince Congress to modify or void the VaxGen contract.
As it turned out, VaxGen had plenty of its own problems. Prior to its recreation as an anthrax-vaccine developer, the company was best known for an early AIDS vaccine that utterly failed to work in comprehensive testing earlier this decade. The company's anthrax vaccine also proved problematic, and when VaxGen missed a 2006 deadline to start human tests, the federal government canceled its contract. VaxGen has been in a death spiral ever since, even yanking a planned merger with the private biotech Raven Biotechnologies because many shareholders preferred liquidation.
Now Emergent has decided that it likes VaxGen's vaccine after all:
For sudden twists of fate, abrupt collapses and the occasional stunning revival, it's hard to beat the biotech industry. Yesterday, for instance, the all-but-dead biotech VaxGen agreed to sell off its ailing anthrax vaccine to its East Coast rival Emergent BioSolutions --a company that spent much of this decade trying to lobby VaxGen out of existence.Formerly known as BioPort, Emergent makes the anthrax vaccine currently used by the U.S. military, although that product is slow, inconvenient, and potentially prone to side effects. In 2004, the government awarded VaxGen a sole-source contract to product a new vaccine that would require fewer shots and work faster, agreeing to pay the company $877.5 million for the work. Emergent expressed its displeasure by spending millions on lobbyists to convince Congress to modify or void the VaxGen contract.
As it turned out, VaxGen had plenty of its own problems. Prior to its recreation as an anthrax-vaccine developer, the company was best known for an early AIDS vaccine that utterly failed to work in comprehensive testing earlier this decade. The company's anthrax vaccine also proved problematic, and when VaxGen missed a 2006 deadline to start human tests, the federal government canceled its contract. VaxGen has been in a death spiral ever since, even yanking a planned merger with the private biotech Raven Biotechnologies because many shareholders preferred liquidation.Now Emergent has decided that it likes VaxGen's vaccine after all:
Meanwhile, Emergent's competitive situation appeared to change in March when Annapolis firm PharmAthene bought the rights to a next-generation anthrax vaccine being developed by British company Avecia Biologics. That made PharmAthene a prime candidate to win an upcoming contract for 25 million doses of anthrax vaccine.And so Emergent ends up pinning its hopes on a product it once hoped to deep-six. It's paying VaxGen $2 million for the vaccine, plus another $8 million in milestones if the development pans out. That's not the most expensive U-turn in the world, but it may well be one of the sharpest.
Emergent has newer vaccine candidates in development, but the research isn't as far along as the VaxGen product. With the government's request for proposals for the new contract due at the end of this month, the company settled on trying to turn around the vaccine, believing the problems have been fixed or are fixable.
-
David Hamilton is the assistant managing editor of CNET News. He has been writing and editing business and tech coverage for about two decades -- the majority of that at the Wall Street Journal in both Tokyo and San Francisco.
Follow on Twitter »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Ill. Sen. Mark Kirk moved to stroke rehab center
- Comedian's BYU black history video goes viral
- Explosion at Fla. horse center kills worker, horse
- Explosion at Fla. horse center kills worker, horse
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






