October 22, 2008 2:39 AM
- Text
UnitedHealth Is Still Bleeding Its Most Profitable Members
(MoneyWatch) Late last week, the health-insurance company UnitedHealth Group said its third-quarter profits only fell by 28 percent, and the fact that things weren't worse led to general applause on Wall Street. Its battered shares are even up almost nine percent since its earnings release.
Look inside the numbers, though, and it's clear that the health plan's biggest -- and still largely overlooked -- problem is still getting worse as employers continue to cut back on fully insured health coverage for their workers. And that's a disquieting trend that's only likely to accelerate as the economy's downhill slide picks up speed.
Here's a quick look at UnitedHealth's membership numbers from its press release (click for a larger version):
At first glance, these don't look too bad. The company did see membership slide somewhat over the third quarter, but it's still up almost three percent over the previous year.
Take a closer look, though, at the top line -- what UnitedHealth calls its "commercial risk-based" business, and what the rest of us know as the fully insured health plans it sells primarily to employers. The number of people UnitedHealth insures in such plans is down 3.5 percent over the past year, and a full seven percent since the end of 2006. The big problem? These plans are far more profitable than any other major chunk of UnitedHealth's business -- and they are inexorably disappearing.
The Minneapolis Star-Tribune, UnitedHealth's hometown paper, put it this way:
clever financial engineering premium increases. Here's CEO Stephen Hemsley:
Further reading:
Look inside the numbers, though, and it's clear that the health plan's biggest -- and still largely overlooked -- problem is still getting worse as employers continue to cut back on fully insured health coverage for their workers. And that's a disquieting trend that's only likely to accelerate as the economy's downhill slide picks up speed.
Here's a quick look at UnitedHealth's membership numbers from its press release (click for a larger version):
At first glance, these don't look too bad. The company did see membership slide somewhat over the third quarter, but it's still up almost three percent over the previous year.
Take a closer look, though, at the top line -- what UnitedHealth calls its "commercial risk-based" business, and what the rest of us know as the fully insured health plans it sells primarily to employers. The number of people UnitedHealth insures in such plans is down 3.5 percent over the past year, and a full seven percent since the end of 2006. The big problem? These plans are far more profitable than any other major chunk of UnitedHealth's business -- and they are inexorably disappearing.
The Minneapolis Star-Tribune, UnitedHealth's hometown paper, put it this way:
For several years, health insurers have struggled with what's known as "buy-downs," industry lingo for employers paring medical benefits that they buy for their workers as premiums go up and up.UnitedHealth execs acknowledge the problem, but say they can manage it with
Now, with the economy heading into a recession, buy-downs may become no-buys as companies shed jobs.
We are of course addressing enrollment, but our greatest near-term priority is optimizing our product alignment, premium yield and medical cost trend in each market. We are confident profit and growth will quickly follow.In other words, raise premiums enough and you can make up the losses from the steady elimination of your more important business. Of course, UnitedHealth seems to be overlooking the fact that higher premiums themselves will push even more companies to scale back or drop their health-insurance benefits -- which, of course, is the main problem in the first place. Now, that's long-term thinking in action.
Further reading:
-
David Hamilton is the assistant managing editor of CNET News. He has been writing and editing business and tech coverage for about two decades -- the majority of that at the Wall Street Journal in both Tokyo and San Francisco.
Follow on Twitter »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Ahmadinejad seeks rebound in Iranian elections
- EU plans Syria sanctions as regime assaults Homs
- Egypt's PM says US threats to cut aid won't work
- 2 Venezuelans to court for posing kids with guns
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






