May 28, 2008 11:24 PM
- Text
Shareholders to Weigh In On Universal Healthcare
The question of whether and how to reform the U.S. healthcare system has opened on a new front -- shareholder activism.
Over the past several months, the SEC has told several major corporations that they must allow shareholder votes on proposals that would commit the companies to "principles for comprehensive universal healthcare." That's a departure for the Bush administration's SEC, which had previously allowed companies to omit the proposals without much fuss.
From the NYT, which broke the story yesterday:
That said, this sort of activism may still signify an important turning point in the healthcare Zeitgeist, one that could demolish all manner of carefully laid plans in the healthcare industry should major reform emerge following the election. So take note, hospital and health-plan CEOs: The bell may be tolling for thee.
© 2008 CBS Interactive Inc.. All Rights Reserved. Over the past several months, the SEC has told several major corporations that they must allow shareholder votes on proposals that would commit the companies to "principles for comprehensive universal healthcare." That's a departure for the Bush administration's SEC, which had previously allowed companies to omit the proposals without much fuss.
From the NYT, which broke the story yesterday:
The S.E.C. has told Boeing, General Motors, United Technologies, Wendy's International and Xcel Energy over the last several months that they may not omit the health care proposal from their proxy materials....Of course, the practical impact of all this is basically nil. The shareholder measures don't even commit the companies to offer healthcare plans to their own workers, and the "principles" that are at stake are commendable, but gaseous in the extreme. (They amount to little more than the hope that access to healthcare should be universal, continuous, affordable and "sustainable for society," which makes me wonder why the IOM didn't throw in free beer and skittles while they had the chance.)
Some, like General Electric and Medco Health Solutions, have explicitly adopted principles that include the goal of universal coverage. Some, like Boeing and Reynolds American, have opposed the shareholder initiatives. At least a dozen companies, like Wal-Mart and I.B.M., have negotiated with shareholders in the belief they can find common ground.
The shareholder proposal asks companies to adopt "principles for comprehensive health care reform" like those devised by the Institute of Medicine, an arm of the National Academy of Sciences.
That said, this sort of activism may still signify an important turning point in the healthcare Zeitgeist, one that could demolish all manner of carefully laid plans in the healthcare industry should major reform emerge following the election. So take note, hospital and health-plan CEOs: The bell may be tolling for thee.
-
David Hamilton is the assistant managing editor of CNET News. He has been writing and editing business and tech coverage for about two decades -- the majority of that at the Wall Street Journal in both Tokyo and San Francisco.
Follow on Twitter »
Add A Comment +
Popular Now in MoneyWatch
- Report: Zuckerberg drops off 40 richest list
- What are the most dangerous websites?
- Facebook shares close at new low
- 10 Best Countries To Live and Work Abroad
- 5 reasons to invest in a 529 plan
- Average home prices hit mid-2002 levels
- 4 Things Not to Buy at Costco
- Top 10 Cities for Single Men
- How to craft an email that gets a reply
- Used Cars: 5 to Avoid (and 5 Better Alternatives)
- The 7 Interview Questions You Must Ask
- Why leaders should scowl
- Reverse Cell Phone Lookup Service is Free and Simple
- Radioactive bluefin tuna crossed the Pacific to US
- Law firm Dewey & LeBoeuf files for bankruptcy
- Why renters should consider buying a home






