January 25, 2010 1:30 PM
- Text
The True Test of the NYT's Paywall Plan Will Be e-Readers
(MoneyWatch) Since The New York Times has elected such a long runway ("the beginning of 2011," according to Arthur and Janet*) until it erects its content paywall, there will be plenty of time to agree or disagree with the company's plans.
There also will be plenty of new data to evaluate its chances for success, should management indeed go through with its promises to enact its plan.
One nugget worth pondering, therefore, is a recent Harris/AdWeek poll indicating that less than a quarter (23 percent) of U.S. users are willing to pay in order to access online newspaper content. Only a tiny fraction of those (5 percent) say they would be willing to pay more than $10/month to do so.
Another data point from that poll that may be even more disturbing is that only 43 percent of U.S. adults say they currently read newspaper content daily either in print or online.
Meanwhile, Forrester projects that traffic to NYT.com will be cut by 80 percent if it erects the paywall.
On the other hand, we also have the following intriguing data, courtesy of L.E.K. Consulting: Those who own e-readers are significantly heavier consumers of print media, i.e., newspapers, magazines, and books than those who don't.
As e-readers are popular among older users, this is not entirely surprising, but it does represent a bit of good news for beleaguered print industry executives like those running the Times.
The essential point here is one we've made before. The opportunity for monetizing content this year or next will not be online -- that horse has long since left the barn.
Rather, the opportunity will be in mobile. Newspapers and e-readers are both mobile devices, and in some markets, such as Japan, they already enjoy a synergistic pricing relationship such that readers pay incrementally for accessing news content when they pay their monthly cellphone bill.
Since the Times execs are talking about implementing a "metered" system of charging for content, it's worth noting that as Google's micro-payment platform emerges later this year, there may be an opportunity online for a bit of revenue action, but the main financial game will be played over mobile devices from here on out.
And that, in the end, is where the Times plan will live or die.
* = Internal memo from Chair Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., and CEO Janet Robinson dated Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:28 AM.
Related BNET Media Links:
Why the New York Times' Paywall Won't Lead to Online Isolation
The New York Times' Paywall: Build Carefully to Avoid Collapse
Latest Attempt by NYT to Erect Paywall Unlikely to Succeed
There also will be plenty of new data to evaluate its chances for success, should management indeed go through with its promises to enact its plan.
One nugget worth pondering, therefore, is a recent Harris/AdWeek poll indicating that less than a quarter (23 percent) of U.S. users are willing to pay in order to access online newspaper content. Only a tiny fraction of those (5 percent) say they would be willing to pay more than $10/month to do so.
Another data point from that poll that may be even more disturbing is that only 43 percent of U.S. adults say they currently read newspaper content daily either in print or online.
Meanwhile, Forrester projects that traffic to NYT.com will be cut by 80 percent if it erects the paywall.
On the other hand, we also have the following intriguing data, courtesy of L.E.K. Consulting: Those who own e-readers are significantly heavier consumers of print media, i.e., newspapers, magazines, and books than those who don't.
As e-readers are popular among older users, this is not entirely surprising, but it does represent a bit of good news for beleaguered print industry executives like those running the Times.
The essential point here is one we've made before. The opportunity for monetizing content this year or next will not be online -- that horse has long since left the barn.
Rather, the opportunity will be in mobile. Newspapers and e-readers are both mobile devices, and in some markets, such as Japan, they already enjoy a synergistic pricing relationship such that readers pay incrementally for accessing news content when they pay their monthly cellphone bill.
Since the Times execs are talking about implementing a "metered" system of charging for content, it's worth noting that as Google's micro-payment platform emerges later this year, there may be an opportunity online for a bit of revenue action, but the main financial game will be played over mobile devices from here on out.
And that, in the end, is where the Times plan will live or die.
* = Internal memo from Chair Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., and CEO Janet Robinson dated Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:28 AM.
Related BNET Media Links:
Why the New York Times' Paywall Won't Lead to Online Isolation
The New York Times' Paywall: Build Carefully to Avoid Collapse
Latest Attempt by NYT to Erect Paywall Unlikely to Succeed
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Nationwide foreclosure pact gains momentum
- Board shake-up at Yahoo
- Fed: Consumer borrowing sees strong growth
- Greek debt talks drag on, banks signal progress
- Dow approaches 13,000, one rally from a record
- Market braces for federal budget battle
- How to handle passive aggressive employees | Leila's House of Corrections
- 4 ways to overcome price resistance on sales
- New York, Calif. holding out foreclosure settlement
- Bernanke sticks with low-rate policy at hearing
- Job openings up: Here's how to get one yourself
- Apple patent throws wrench into Facebook plans
- Yum! Brands forecasts strong expansion overseas
- Cash balance retirement plans: Annuity options
- Tax prep tips: Jill Schlesinger makes it easy
- Why is Greece negotiating over debt when it could be dictating?
- Job openings jump to a near 3-year high
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Prosecutors want Sandusky kept indoors pre-trial
- Study: Ocean fish may have freshwater ancestor
- Oil rises to near $99 after US crude supply drop
- Asia stocks up following surge on Wall Street
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






