September 18, 2009 4:46 PM
- Text
NYT's SEC Filing: We Violated Our Exec Incentive Plan
(MoneyWatch) In what had to be an embarrassing filing with the SEC today, The New York Times revealed that it "has discovered that portions of previously-awarded stock option grants to purchase the company's class A common stock were in excess of that permitted to be granted to a single individual during any calendar year under the terms of the company's 1991 executive stock incentive plan, as amended."
According to the filing, the annual maximum for options thus allocated is 400,000, but in 2008, President and CEO Janet Robinson was awarded 650,000, and in 2009, Chairman and President Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., was granted 500,000.
The executives have agreed to declare the excess options "null and void." In return, the company is awarding them "deferred payment stock appreciation rights" over time of an equivalent value.
The filing goes on to note that both Robinson and Sulzberger were also granted long-term performance awards for the three-year cycles ending in 2011 and 2012 that -- if paid -- would have amounted to $3,500, 000 each, and that these also exceeded the plan limit by $500,000 per person.
The company's directors have therefore lowered the maxmium payouts to $3,000,000 should either exec achieve the financial goals underlying this particular incentive structure.
Inside companies big and small, we all know that innocent mistakes happen, and there certainly is nothing indicating that this is anything but that. But at a time the Times has been struggling financially and trying to handle a massive debt load, it just didn't need more bad publicity.
Nevertheless, that is what this will bring.
According to the filing, the annual maximum for options thus allocated is 400,000, but in 2008, President and CEO Janet Robinson was awarded 650,000, and in 2009, Chairman and President Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., was granted 500,000.
The executives have agreed to declare the excess options "null and void." In return, the company is awarding them "deferred payment stock appreciation rights" over time of an equivalent value.
The filing goes on to note that both Robinson and Sulzberger were also granted long-term performance awards for the three-year cycles ending in 2011 and 2012 that -- if paid -- would have amounted to $3,500, 000 each, and that these also exceeded the plan limit by $500,000 per person.
The company's directors have therefore lowered the maxmium payouts to $3,000,000 should either exec achieve the financial goals underlying this particular incentive structure.
Inside companies big and small, we all know that innocent mistakes happen, and there certainly is nothing indicating that this is anything but that. But at a time the Times has been struggling financially and trying to handle a massive debt load, it just didn't need more bad publicity.
Nevertheless, that is what this will bring.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Hotel marketed to gay travelers to open in NYC
- Huge art work honoring Havel on display in Prague
- Europe's cold close zoo outside Paris
- Hopefuls strut their conservative stuff at CPAC
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






