August 5, 2009 1:47 AM
- Text
Fish Rot From the Head (and so do Media Companies)
(MoneyWatch) Recently, I had the wonderful opportunity to speak at length with a very successful newspaper executive in another country (one far less privileged than the U.S.) about the problems that are plaguing our domestic publications, and he opened my eyes to an issue we on the business side rarely mention.
That is the role of the "editor-in-chief" or whatever title your company confers on your content czar.
In his country, the editor-in-chief is always on duty. (S)he recognizes that along with the title comes a responsibility to the community (read: audience) (s)he is serving. These folks earn large salaries, relatively speaking. They should work long hours. Their staffs always know how to contact them at any hour should a breaking news story of major significance occur.
In other words, they remain "on call," rather like an old-fashioned family doctor.
But here in the U.S., we live in an era where those who are entrusted with such positions ?€" at newspapers, magazines, or websites ?€" often sense a different opportunity altogether, it seems. Rather than seeing that being the top editor (or news director in broadcast media) is a sacred chance to serve a community, these selfish careerists sense a chance to become stars.
Therefore, you will see them appearing on TV shows, promoting themselves, rather than their publications. Or, you will see them publishing books, and going on book tours, leaving the less-glamorous work of actually supervising the production of stories back home to their underlings.
The foreign media executive I spoke to said he was shocked when he arrived to discuss a major business initiative with one major U.S. newspaper company because the editor-in-chief did not attend the meeting at all, as he was on a month-long "book tour."
You know, folks, I've been around a long time, had lots of jobs, including "editor-in-chief" positions, or the equivalent, in radio, TV, newspapers, magazines, websites, and other media companies, and I would have considered it an unforgivable error on my part had I ever been MIA when a major story broke, or a major business opportunity was being discussed.
You just don't do that, not in my book.
But of course I am old-school, which is probably why I am neither rich nor famous. Rather, I always just tried to do my job. We often point to outdated business models here at Bnet, but it is also true that the role self-oriented content execs have played and are playing in the destruction of their own companies is a salient factor deserving review.
That is the role of the "editor-in-chief" or whatever title your company confers on your content czar.
In his country, the editor-in-chief is always on duty. (S)he recognizes that along with the title comes a responsibility to the community (read: audience) (s)he is serving. These folks earn large salaries, relatively speaking. They should work long hours. Their staffs always know how to contact them at any hour should a breaking news story of major significance occur.
In other words, they remain "on call," rather like an old-fashioned family doctor.
But here in the U.S., we live in an era where those who are entrusted with such positions ?€" at newspapers, magazines, or websites ?€" often sense a different opportunity altogether, it seems. Rather than seeing that being the top editor (or news director in broadcast media) is a sacred chance to serve a community, these selfish careerists sense a chance to become stars.
Therefore, you will see them appearing on TV shows, promoting themselves, rather than their publications. Or, you will see them publishing books, and going on book tours, leaving the less-glamorous work of actually supervising the production of stories back home to their underlings.
The foreign media executive I spoke to said he was shocked when he arrived to discuss a major business initiative with one major U.S. newspaper company because the editor-in-chief did not attend the meeting at all, as he was on a month-long "book tour."
You know, folks, I've been around a long time, had lots of jobs, including "editor-in-chief" positions, or the equivalent, in radio, TV, newspapers, magazines, websites, and other media companies, and I would have considered it an unforgivable error on my part had I ever been MIA when a major story broke, or a major business opportunity was being discussed.
You just don't do that, not in my book.
But of course I am old-school, which is probably why I am neither rich nor famous. Rather, I always just tried to do my job. We often point to outdated business models here at Bnet, but it is also true that the role self-oriented content execs have played and are playing in the destruction of their own companies is a salient factor deserving review.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Houston remembered at Clive Davis gala
- Dudley leads Suns past Kings 98-84
- Faces of protest are as varied as Russia itself
- Mystery disease kills thousands in Central America
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






