July 3, 2009 6:11 PM
- Text
FTC to Probe Bloggers Who Take Money to Hawk Stuff
(MoneyWatch) The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is drawing up guidelines that will allow it to investigate bloggers who promote products, as well as the companies that pay them to do so, when such conflicts of interest are not disclosed to readers. The agency also will investigate any false claims by the bloggers that result from this practice.
According to an Associated Press report, "Many bloggers have accepted perks such as free laptops, trips to Europe, $500 gift cards or even thousands of dollars for a 200-word post."
There will be predictable howls of outrage from those who resent any kind of government oversight of what they write or how they make money. But I imagine the FTC will focus only on large-scale, egregious offenders, the kinds of false prophets who shamelessly hawk products as if they were providing independent reviews, when they actually are being secretly compensated to do so.
Blogging is a new enough media form that the kinds of industry standards and ethics that have long existed (if not always followed) in traditional media have yet to emerge. Once the FTC implements its oversight role for blogs, it may want to take a look at the social media space. As we've noted over the past few months, several "pay per Tweet" scandals have developed over Twitter, although the micro-blogging community has so far proved fairly good at self-policing these corrupt practices.
I've always been puzzled by the psychology of taking money secretly to promote something publicly. All one has to do is disclose the relationship with the company paying you to do so, and you're in the clear. Everyone has conflicts-of-interest, some are financial, others emotional, others religious or academic or political. The solution isn't to censor yourself, it's disclosure.
Previous posts on conflicts of interests and product promotion at Twitter:
New Pay Per Tweet Scheme a Threat to Twitter?
Pay Per Tweet Scandal in U.S.; Secret Sponsor Deal in U.K.
Disclosure: So far, nobody has offered me a free laptop, a trip to Europe, a $500 gift card, or thousands of dollars to promote anything, so I must be doing something right -- or wrong, depending on your point-of-view. If someone does, however, you'll be the first to know.)
According to an Associated Press report, "Many bloggers have accepted perks such as free laptops, trips to Europe, $500 gift cards or even thousands of dollars for a 200-word post."
There will be predictable howls of outrage from those who resent any kind of government oversight of what they write or how they make money. But I imagine the FTC will focus only on large-scale, egregious offenders, the kinds of false prophets who shamelessly hawk products as if they were providing independent reviews, when they actually are being secretly compensated to do so.
Blogging is a new enough media form that the kinds of industry standards and ethics that have long existed (if not always followed) in traditional media have yet to emerge. Once the FTC implements its oversight role for blogs, it may want to take a look at the social media space. As we've noted over the past few months, several "pay per Tweet" scandals have developed over Twitter, although the micro-blogging community has so far proved fairly good at self-policing these corrupt practices.
I've always been puzzled by the psychology of taking money secretly to promote something publicly. All one has to do is disclose the relationship with the company paying you to do so, and you're in the clear. Everyone has conflicts-of-interest, some are financial, others emotional, others religious or academic or political. The solution isn't to censor yourself, it's disclosure.
Previous posts on conflicts of interests and product promotion at Twitter:
New Pay Per Tweet Scheme a Threat to Twitter?
Pay Per Tweet Scandal in U.S.; Secret Sponsor Deal in U.K.
Disclosure: So far, nobody has offered me a free laptop, a trip to Europe, a $500 gift card, or thousands of dollars to promote anything, so I must be doing something right -- or wrong, depending on your point-of-view. If someone does, however, you'll be the first to know.)
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Lawyer for Cuban agents vows last-ditch appeal
- Mexican navy finds 10 bodies in mass grave sites
- Thunder upend Jazz 101-87
- Thunder upend Jazz 101-87
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






