May 4, 2009 4:38 PM
- Text
WashPost Ad Revenue Plummets by One-Third in Q-1
(MoneyWatch)
Of all the major newspapers on various "endangered" lists these days, one that rarely gets mentioned is the Washington Post. Unlike many of its competitors, whose stocks trade for pennies or a few dollars, the Post has been soaring up there in Google-like territory, at $350/share and a $3.25 market cap (~ four times that of The New York Times).
But the daily newspaper in our nation's capital is hardly immune to the disaster sweeping its industry; it's just that its parent company does a lot more than simply publish an influential newspaper. For its first quarter financial results, just filed today with the SEC, the company reveals that revenues from the newspaper division have fallen to the point they make up only around 16 percent of the company's total revenue -- as opposed to around 20 percent just a year earlier.
The newspaper's numbers are bad, very bad. It lost 33 percent of its advertising revenue from what it received in Q-1 last year, although its circulation remained relatively stable. In dollar terms, the newspaper ad revenues were off by $35.2 million, which single-handedly sent the giant company into the red, with a $19.5 million operating loss.
Think about it. Without its flagship paper, The Washington Post Company would have posted a $15.7 million operating profit. You better believe the execs inside the corporation's now much larger divisions (cable TV and Kaplan's education) have taken notice.
Then, almost as an afterthought, there's the magazine publishing division. Here's what the company's 8-K reports: "Revenue for the magazine publishing division totaled $46.1 million for the first quarter of 2009, a 14 percent decrease from $53.4 million for the first quarter of 2008. The decline is due to a 23 percent reduction in advertising revenue at Newsweek due primarily to fewer ad pages at the domestic and international editions. In February 2009, Newsweek announced a circulation rate base reduction at its domestic edition, from 2.6 million to 1.5 million, by January 2010."
Of all the major newspapers on various "endangered" lists these days, one that rarely gets mentioned is the Washington Post. Unlike many of its competitors, whose stocks trade for pennies or a few dollars, the Post has been soaring up there in Google-like territory, at $350/share and a $3.25 market cap (~ four times that of The New York Times).But the daily newspaper in our nation's capital is hardly immune to the disaster sweeping its industry; it's just that its parent company does a lot more than simply publish an influential newspaper. For its first quarter financial results, just filed today with the SEC, the company reveals that revenues from the newspaper division have fallen to the point they make up only around 16 percent of the company's total revenue -- as opposed to around 20 percent just a year earlier.
The newspaper's numbers are bad, very bad. It lost 33 percent of its advertising revenue from what it received in Q-1 last year, although its circulation remained relatively stable. In dollar terms, the newspaper ad revenues were off by $35.2 million, which single-handedly sent the giant company into the red, with a $19.5 million operating loss.
Think about it. Without its flagship paper, The Washington Post Company would have posted a $15.7 million operating profit. You better believe the execs inside the corporation's now much larger divisions (cable TV and Kaplan's education) have taken notice.
Then, almost as an afterthought, there's the magazine publishing division. Here's what the company's 8-K reports: "Revenue for the magazine publishing division totaled $46.1 million for the first quarter of 2009, a 14 percent decrease from $53.4 million for the first quarter of 2008. The decline is due to a 23 percent reduction in advertising revenue at Newsweek due primarily to fewer ad pages at the domestic and international editions. In February 2009, Newsweek announced a circulation rate base reduction at its domestic edition, from 2.6 million to 1.5 million, by January 2010."
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Rep. Bachus faces insider-trading investigation
- Singapore DBS bank profit jumps 7.8 percent in 4Q
- Owner of Sierra mine surrenders to face charges
- Asia stocks slip as Greek bailout remains in limbo
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
on CBS News






