April 11, 2009 1:50 AM
- Text
Al Gore Knows Zip Re: the Media Business
(MoneyWatch)
Maybe some people like to say, "I told you so," but I've been around way too long to feel any such pleasure when one of my lonely analyses turns out to have been right on, some 15 months later.
Probably the only reason you are reading my posts here at Bnet at all is due to a certain piece I wrote on one of my personal blogs, back in January 2008, expressing my skepticism about whether Al Gore's Current TV would be able to pull off what it then projected would be a $100 million IPO.
Yep, I was asked to write for Bnet on the basis of that particular post.
Well, today, Current Media finally announced that it has canceled plans for that $100 million IPO. In a filing with the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission, Current blamed its move on "current market conditions."
I beg to disagree. This company has never presented a compelling business model that would justify such a huge investment of our common resources as to commit hundreds millions of our collective savings on its behalf.
What was clear to me back then has finally been admitted to be true by the company's leaders today. Lesson? Beware of hustlers!
Maybe some people like to say, "I told you so," but I've been around way too long to feel any such pleasure when one of my lonely analyses turns out to have been right on, some 15 months later.Probably the only reason you are reading my posts here at Bnet at all is due to a certain piece I wrote on one of my personal blogs, back in January 2008, expressing my skepticism about whether Al Gore's Current TV would be able to pull off what it then projected would be a $100 million IPO.
Yep, I was asked to write for Bnet on the basis of that particular post.
Well, today, Current Media finally announced that it has canceled plans for that $100 million IPO. In a filing with the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission, Current blamed its move on "current market conditions."
I beg to disagree. This company has never presented a compelling business model that would justify such a huge investment of our common resources as to commit hundreds millions of our collective savings on its behalf.
What was clear to me back then has finally been admitted to be true by the company's leaders today. Lesson? Beware of hustlers!
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Arab League considers revival of Syrian mission
- Iraq opens new oil export terminal in Persian Gulf
- Al-Qaida chief urges outside help for Syria rebels
- Saudi Mobily secures $2.7B Islamic loan
on Facebook
- Whitney Houston 1963-2012
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Remembering Whitney Houston 1963-2012
on CBS News






