June 24, 2008 6:30 PM
- Text
Google News as the Savior of the News Business
(MoneyWatch)
Enough of dire predictions of doom! Let's look at some good news about U.S. news organizations for a change. When it come to their online news sites, fantastic growth in traffic has become the norm over the past two years. According to Nielsen Online, the following companies are leading the way with at least 30 percent growth and at least ten million unique visitors per month:
Who's missing from this list? Why, Google News, of course. Since its launch earlier in the decade, any number of hands have been wrung by traditional news execs fearful that the search and advertising giant would drive them out of business altogether.
That may still happen, but not because Google wants it to.
Unlike the way it behaves in its core businesses, Google maintains a surprisingly passive, downright uncompetitive stance when it comes to news. Unlike every other major player, no human editors have ever worked at Google News. It creates no original content, simply utilizing algorithms to aggregate and displays news articles from everyone else in the business. Lacking any "voice" or other signs of a human touch, Google News lags far behind the others in its growth rate over the past two years -- a paltry 11.7 percent.
Google News is smaller than seven of the eight industry leaders listed above (only Fox is smaller), but that's not why you no longer hear much complaining by media execs about the Mountain View, Calif., company any longer.
The relative silence is about something else entirely -- profits. "I'd estimate that most of the big newspaper sites get between 10 and 25 percent of their traffic via Google's links," one insider told me recently. This is free traffic, the best kind, and a major factor behind some of the explosive growth of the industry overall.
In fact, the big company so many in media used to love to hate has quietly been serving as major prop to everyone else in the news business. Google doesn't even earn any money off its news service, because it's an ad-free environment.
As Google's "Good Samaritan" role becomes better appreciated, might we start hearing news execs complaining that Google News is not growing fast enough? Given how dependent everyone else is becoming on this massive, free referral service, stranger things could happen...
Enough of dire predictions of doom! Let's look at some good news about U.S. news organizations for a change. When it come to their online news sites, fantastic growth in traffic has become the norm over the past two years. According to Nielsen Online, the following companies are leading the way with at least 30 percent growth and at least ten million unique visitors per month:| New York Times | 72.7 |
| CNN/Time | 53.9 |
| MSNBC | 42.1 |
| AOL News | 40.8 |
| Yahoo News | 35.8 |
| Fox News | 35.7 |
| Tribune | 35.6 |
| Yahoo News | 32.6 |
That may still happen, but not because Google wants it to.
Unlike the way it behaves in its core businesses, Google maintains a surprisingly passive, downright uncompetitive stance when it comes to news. Unlike every other major player, no human editors have ever worked at Google News. It creates no original content, simply utilizing algorithms to aggregate and displays news articles from everyone else in the business. Lacking any "voice" or other signs of a human touch, Google News lags far behind the others in its growth rate over the past two years -- a paltry 11.7 percent.
Google News is smaller than seven of the eight industry leaders listed above (only Fox is smaller), but that's not why you no longer hear much complaining by media execs about the Mountain View, Calif., company any longer.
The relative silence is about something else entirely -- profits. "I'd estimate that most of the big newspaper sites get between 10 and 25 percent of their traffic via Google's links," one insider told me recently. This is free traffic, the best kind, and a major factor behind some of the explosive growth of the industry overall.
In fact, the big company so many in media used to love to hate has quietly been serving as major prop to everyone else in the news business. Google doesn't even earn any money off its news service, because it's an ad-free environment.
As Google's "Good Samaritan" role becomes better appreciated, might we start hearing news execs complaining that Google News is not growing fast enough? Given how dependent everyone else is becoming on this massive, free referral service, stranger things could happen...
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Heather Mills says McCartney calls were hacked
- Oscar statues fly from Chicago to Los Angeles
- Oscar statues fly from Chicago to Los Angeles
- TV producer lands in Mexico to face murder charges
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






