April 25, 2008 2:49 PM
- Text
CW Pulls "Gossip Girl" From Web, and Ratings Suffer
(MoneyWatch)
The season premiere of Gossip Girl -- the incredibly popular CW program that the current cover of New York Magazine calls the "Greatest. Show. Ever." -- debuted this week to slightly lower numbers than its previous season, with 2.44 million viewers as opposed to 2.5 million. It's significant because of the CBS and Time Warner-owned network's seriously flawed strategy to increase viewership, which was to stop posting new episodes of the show on the web.
I suppose it seems like a logical move in some twisted business sense: everyone loves our show, now there's only one place to see our show (legally), so our numbers should increase. But making a show less available -- in addition to taking something away that was previously offered -- could really only have one outcome.
The Toad Stool makes an excellent suggestion on the subject -- rather than limiting the show's reach, why not use the medium where it gained its popularity to boost its numbers, via social networks and other promotions?
I've never seen the program, but it seems like an even more absurd move from The CW considering the show's premise, which centers on a gossip blogger and a bunch of rich kids in New York (with such entitled surnames as Archibald, Waldorf, and van der Woodsen).
The season premiere of Gossip Girl -- the incredibly popular CW program that the current cover of New York Magazine calls the "Greatest. Show. Ever." -- debuted this week to slightly lower numbers than its previous season, with 2.44 million viewers as opposed to 2.5 million. It's significant because of the CBS and Time Warner-owned network's seriously flawed strategy to increase viewership, which was to stop posting new episodes of the show on the web.I suppose it seems like a logical move in some twisted business sense: everyone loves our show, now there's only one place to see our show (legally), so our numbers should increase. But making a show less available -- in addition to taking something away that was previously offered -- could really only have one outcome.
The Toad Stool makes an excellent suggestion on the subject -- rather than limiting the show's reach, why not use the medium where it gained its popularity to boost its numbers, via social networks and other promotions?
I've never seen the program, but it seems like an even more absurd move from The CW considering the show's premise, which centers on a gossip blogger and a bunch of rich kids in New York (with such entitled surnames as Archibald, Waldorf, and van der Woodsen).
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Faces of protest are as varied as Russia itself
- Mystery disease kills thousands in Central America
- Nowitzki, Terry lead Mavs over Blazers in 2OT
- Richardson hits nine 3s, Magic top Bucks 99-94
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






