September 28, 2009 1:06 PM
- Text
Recyclers Top Newsweek Food and Beverage Industry Green Rankings
(MoneyWatch) Coca-Cola Enterprises, Coca-Cola's biggest bottler, took the number one spot on Newsweek's 2009 Green Rankings in the food and beverage category -- followed by the Coca-Cola Company itself. Both companies were praised for their focus on recycling and water efficiency.
Green ratings are a tricky subject; there are so many different elements to look at. Which is more important -- a company's carbon footprint or its water footprint? Do companies get points for going organic? Should use of genetically modified ingredients be a factor at all?
There are no simple answers, but I liked that the Newsweek rankings broke things down by sector -- acknowledging that, for example, a bank might have an easier time being sustainable than, say, an oil company. So although Coca-Cola Enterprises was No. 1 in the food and beverage industry, it took only 36th place out of the 500 major companies Newsweek looked at.
Newsweek's food and beverage industry does not include restaurants, however; Starbucks actually ranked above Coca-Cola Enterprises at No. 10, giving it first place in the Media/Travel/Leisure category, just above McDonald's.
Brown-Forman was third on the food and beverage list -- it's another big recycler, and it earned bonus points for the solar roof on one of its wineries. Molson Coors Brewing came in fourth for its efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, though Newsweek scolded the company for not doing more to recycle. I'm sensing a theme here.
ConAgra was at the other end of the scale; it not only had the lowest ranking in the food industry, but also came in 497th* out of 500 companies total, well below several oil companies. Unfortunately, Newsweek did not provide much information about how ConAgra earned such low scores. In fact, Newsweek did not seem to think any of the bottom companies deserved comment; those entries are missing the paragraph of explanation found on the pages of the high-scorers.
Newsweek itself acknowledges its system isn't perfect. "Rankings inevitably provoke controversy--and we welcome that. Our hope is to open a conversation on measuring environmental performance--an essential first step toward improving it."
*UPDATE: From Newsweek: "There was a miscalculation in ConAgra's water usage, so they have been re-ranked at number 342 from 497 on our Green Rankings."
Green ratings are a tricky subject; there are so many different elements to look at. Which is more important -- a company's carbon footprint or its water footprint? Do companies get points for going organic? Should use of genetically modified ingredients be a factor at all?
There are no simple answers, but I liked that the Newsweek rankings broke things down by sector -- acknowledging that, for example, a bank might have an easier time being sustainable than, say, an oil company. So although Coca-Cola Enterprises was No. 1 in the food and beverage industry, it took only 36th place out of the 500 major companies Newsweek looked at.
Newsweek's food and beverage industry does not include restaurants, however; Starbucks actually ranked above Coca-Cola Enterprises at No. 10, giving it first place in the Media/Travel/Leisure category, just above McDonald's.
Brown-Forman was third on the food and beverage list -- it's another big recycler, and it earned bonus points for the solar roof on one of its wineries. Molson Coors Brewing came in fourth for its efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, though Newsweek scolded the company for not doing more to recycle. I'm sensing a theme here.
ConAgra was at the other end of the scale; it not only had the lowest ranking in the food industry, but also came in 497th* out of 500 companies total, well below several oil companies. Unfortunately, Newsweek did not provide much information about how ConAgra earned such low scores. In fact, Newsweek did not seem to think any of the bottom companies deserved comment; those entries are missing the paragraph of explanation found on the pages of the high-scorers.
Newsweek itself acknowledges its system isn't perfect. "Rankings inevitably provoke controversy--and we welcome that. Our hope is to open a conversation on measuring environmental performance--an essential first step toward improving it."
*UPDATE: From Newsweek: "There was a miscalculation in ConAgra's water usage, so they have been re-ranked at number 342 from 497 on our Green Rankings."
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Reactions to Whitney Houston's death
- Colaiacovo scores in OT to lift Blues over Avs 3-2
- Whitney Houston's voice will never be forgotten
- Turkmenistan votes in presidential election
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






