June 15, 2009 11:59 AM
- Text
Starbucks Plays Catch-Up With Food Offerings
(MoneyWatch) Starbucks announced earlier this month that it's revamping its menu. It's adding new salads and baked goods, all with a new health focus, under the campaign "Real Food. Simply delicious."
It's actually kind of surprising to me that Starbucks has managed to be as successful as it is with such limited food offerings. As one blogger put it, "Unlike the greasy looking fast food joints, Starbucks looks like a sophisticated cafe where you might find something reasonable to eat - except that's totally not the case." But now McDonald's has become a major competitor (though Starbucks is still officially in denial about this), and the company needs to step up its game.
"Food has been the Achilles' heel of the company," Starbucks marketing VP Michelle Gass told Reuters. "That statement will be long buried after we launch this program." The new items are slated to roll out at the end of June.
Starbucks recently started offering coffee-and-breakfast deals for $3.95, which has reportedly given the company a boost. CFO Troy Alstead told Bloomberg that existing customers are now buying food along with their lattes, though he didn't address whether the offer is drawing in new customers as well.
Starbucks' existing food items haven't earned much praise online. A writer at the Atlantic called Starbucks baked goods "embarrassingly sawdust-y" and comments at Starbucks Gossip were even less kind in their assessment.
The new Starbucks baked goods will use fewer ingredients and cut down on artificial additives. The company is also eliminating high-fructose corn syrup, as I wrote about last week.
Critics point out -- rightly -- that "natural" does not mean "healthy," but my guess is that the new items will be healthier in other ways as well.
For one thing, the new items will have fewer calories than the items they're replacing. I stopped by a Starbucks when I was in Manhattan recently, and I was rather shocked to read how many calories were in a single slice of frosted lemon cake. New York was one of the first places to institute calorie-labeling laws, but the trend has gathered so much steam that even restaurant groups are getting on board and supporting federal legislation. No doubt that's a factor in Starbucks' decision -- customers are much more likely to think twice about an item when the words "650 calories" are posted right next to the price.
It's actually kind of surprising to me that Starbucks has managed to be as successful as it is with such limited food offerings. As one blogger put it, "Unlike the greasy looking fast food joints, Starbucks looks like a sophisticated cafe where you might find something reasonable to eat - except that's totally not the case." But now McDonald's has become a major competitor (though Starbucks is still officially in denial about this), and the company needs to step up its game.
"Food has been the Achilles' heel of the company," Starbucks marketing VP Michelle Gass told Reuters. "That statement will be long buried after we launch this program." The new items are slated to roll out at the end of June.
Starbucks recently started offering coffee-and-breakfast deals for $3.95, which has reportedly given the company a boost. CFO Troy Alstead told Bloomberg that existing customers are now buying food along with their lattes, though he didn't address whether the offer is drawing in new customers as well.
Starbucks' existing food items haven't earned much praise online. A writer at the Atlantic called Starbucks baked goods "embarrassingly sawdust-y" and comments at Starbucks Gossip were even less kind in their assessment.
The new Starbucks baked goods will use fewer ingredients and cut down on artificial additives. The company is also eliminating high-fructose corn syrup, as I wrote about last week.
Critics point out -- rightly -- that "natural" does not mean "healthy," but my guess is that the new items will be healthier in other ways as well.
For one thing, the new items will have fewer calories than the items they're replacing. I stopped by a Starbucks when I was in Manhattan recently, and I was rather shocked to read how many calories were in a single slice of frosted lemon cake. New York was one of the first places to institute calorie-labeling laws, but the trend has gathered so much steam that even restaurant groups are getting on board and supporting federal legislation. No doubt that's a factor in Starbucks' decision -- customers are much more likely to think twice about an item when the words "650 calories" are posted right next to the price.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Man pleads guilty in NYC to harassing Ivanka Trump
- Mortenson asks judge to toss 'Three Cups' lawsuit
- Naomi Watts to star in Princess Diana biopic
- BCBG offers soothing start to NY Fashion Week
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






