March 6, 2009 2:48 AM
- Text
Starbucks Via 'Better than Most Instant Coffee,' But ...
(MoneyWatch) March 4 was the launch date for Starbucks' new Via instant coffee, so, curious, I strolled over to my neighborhood Starbucks in the Seattle suburb where I live -- only to have the barista tell me that only select Seattle-area stores had Via in stock. The rest of the region won't get it for another couple weeks, he said.
But from what I can gather online, initial reaction to the new Via is generally favorable. It might not be great coffee, but it's pretty good for instant, most early tasters seem to be saying. Here's an overview:
The Chicago Sun-Times said most tasters were "lukewarm" about it. One woman elaborated, saying: "It didn't taste very fresh. It didn't have a strong coffee flavor. It was kind of watery."
A blogger at ChicagoExaminer.com, who describes herself as a one-cup-a-day coffee drinker, was more upbeat. "I like it!!" she enthused. "It tastes pretty close to a cup of coffee to me."
At the Chicago Tribune, a tasting panel that included a restaurant critic praised Via, calling it "surprisingly bold and complex," "nice and strong tasting but a little thin," "totally acceptable, especially if I were in a rush," and "really good if a little on the burned side."
At Fast Company, tasters actually preferred instant Via to regular brewed Starbucks: "Tasters raved about its flavor ('balanced, not bitter'), texture ('by far the smoothest'), and aroma ('smells like fancy coffee'). And one called it ?€" irony alert! ?€" 'better than the coffee you buy in Starbucks.'"
And at WalletPop.com, reviews were mixed, with one taster calling it "as good as 'slightly stale regular coffee ... not too bad, better than most instant coffee, which typically tastes like hot water with coffee flavoring. Starbucks instant tastes like real coffee, albeit slightly stale real coffee.'"
Meanwhile, here in the Coffee Capital, Seattle Weekly found a staffer who actually drinks instant coffee regularly (infidel). His take: "marginally superior to Folger's or Taster's Choice. A little rounder and more full-bodied. But somehow also manages to be more bitter and burnt-tasting."
But at roughly a dollar a cup, it also manages to be "over 10 times the price of other instants, which come in at closer to 8 cents a cup," the taster complained. As a result, he's going to stick with "my mountain-grown, fill-it-to-the-rim, best-part-of-waking-up, coffee crystals."
But from what I can gather online, initial reaction to the new Via is generally favorable. It might not be great coffee, but it's pretty good for instant, most early tasters seem to be saying. Here's an overview:
The Chicago Sun-Times said most tasters were "lukewarm" about it. One woman elaborated, saying: "It didn't taste very fresh. It didn't have a strong coffee flavor. It was kind of watery."
A blogger at ChicagoExaminer.com, who describes herself as a one-cup-a-day coffee drinker, was more upbeat. "I like it!!" she enthused. "It tastes pretty close to a cup of coffee to me."
At the Chicago Tribune, a tasting panel that included a restaurant critic praised Via, calling it "surprisingly bold and complex," "nice and strong tasting but a little thin," "totally acceptable, especially if I were in a rush," and "really good if a little on the burned side."
At Fast Company, tasters actually preferred instant Via to regular brewed Starbucks: "Tasters raved about its flavor ('balanced, not bitter'), texture ('by far the smoothest'), and aroma ('smells like fancy coffee'). And one called it ?€" irony alert! ?€" 'better than the coffee you buy in Starbucks.'"
And at WalletPop.com, reviews were mixed, with one taster calling it "as good as 'slightly stale regular coffee ... not too bad, better than most instant coffee, which typically tastes like hot water with coffee flavoring. Starbucks instant tastes like real coffee, albeit slightly stale real coffee.'"
Meanwhile, here in the Coffee Capital, Seattle Weekly found a staffer who actually drinks instant coffee regularly (infidel). His take: "marginally superior to Folger's or Taster's Choice. A little rounder and more full-bodied. But somehow also manages to be more bitter and burnt-tasting."
But at roughly a dollar a cup, it also manages to be "over 10 times the price of other instants, which come in at closer to 8 cents a cup," the taster complained. As a result, he's going to stick with "my mountain-grown, fill-it-to-the-rim, best-part-of-waking-up, coffee crystals."
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Social worker recounts minutes before Powell fire
- Embalmer takes speech case to Mass. high court
- Embalmer takes speech case to Mass. high court
- British man wanted in '93 heist arrested in Mo.
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
on CBS News






