January 27, 2009 2:41 PM
- Text
Coffee Jitters: Starbucks May Slash More Jobs
(MoneyWatch) A lot of employees will be listening closely tomorrow when Starbucks presents its quarterly earnings report.
Rumors have been swirling around Seattle -- and indeed all around the coffee universe -- that a 1,000-person job cut is in the offing this week. According to a report by a Seattle-based stock analyst, there won't be cuts at the store level. Instead, most would come from the ranks of the 3,500 people who work at Starbucks' corporate headquarters, with the remainder coming from district managers.
But if you go online to StarbucksGossip.com, you'll get a slightly different story. Disgruntled Starbucks partners report they suspect the company is also eliminating assistant store managers, with one of them reporting he was warned to take a demotion back to a barista post or see his job eliminated. Several report that baristas have had their hours cut.
Amidst all this, investors are losing confidence too.
Needless to say, this was not what anyone had in mind last January, when once-revered Starbucks chairman Howard Schultz ousted former CEO Jim McDonald and moved back into the big chair. Schultz vowed to return his company to its glory days: "We know that we can improve our performance by getting back to the essence of what drove Starbucks' past success -- our passion for the business and a complete focus on the customer and our relationship with our people."
But that relationship with Starbucks' own people may need some work. Starbucks still is considered a good company to work for, but it's slipped in the most-recent Fortune rankings. A decision to take delivery on a new $45 million corporate jet last year, even as the company closed 616 stores and cut 401(k) contributions, doesn't seem to have helped morale, especially after it was reported that Schultz used the jet to fly his family to Hawaii for the holidays. (Corporate policy requires Schultz to reimburse the cost of personal trips.)
Over the weekend, the Seattle Times reported the comments of one angry and anonymous employee, who said "I am sick and tired of being blamed for not meeting my budget when the economy is in a recession. I used to be proud of my company ... now I am embarrassed and feel physically ill every time I have to go to work."
Rumors have been swirling around Seattle -- and indeed all around the coffee universe -- that a 1,000-person job cut is in the offing this week. According to a report by a Seattle-based stock analyst, there won't be cuts at the store level. Instead, most would come from the ranks of the 3,500 people who work at Starbucks' corporate headquarters, with the remainder coming from district managers.
But if you go online to StarbucksGossip.com, you'll get a slightly different story. Disgruntled Starbucks partners report they suspect the company is also eliminating assistant store managers, with one of them reporting he was warned to take a demotion back to a barista post or see his job eliminated. Several report that baristas have had their hours cut.
Amidst all this, investors are losing confidence too.
Needless to say, this was not what anyone had in mind last January, when once-revered Starbucks chairman Howard Schultz ousted former CEO Jim McDonald and moved back into the big chair. Schultz vowed to return his company to its glory days: "We know that we can improve our performance by getting back to the essence of what drove Starbucks' past success -- our passion for the business and a complete focus on the customer and our relationship with our people."
But that relationship with Starbucks' own people may need some work. Starbucks still is considered a good company to work for, but it's slipped in the most-recent Fortune rankings. A decision to take delivery on a new $45 million corporate jet last year, even as the company closed 616 stores and cut 401(k) contributions, doesn't seem to have helped morale, especially after it was reported that Schultz used the jet to fly his family to Hawaii for the holidays. (Corporate policy requires Schultz to reimburse the cost of personal trips.)
Over the weekend, the Seattle Times reported the comments of one angry and anonymous employee, who said "I am sick and tired of being blamed for not meeting my budget when the economy is in a recession. I used to be proud of my company ... now I am embarrassed and feel physically ill every time I have to go to work."
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Exhibit looks back at 50 years of American fashion
- Man pleads guilty in NYC to harassing Ivanka Trump
- Mortenson asks judge to toss 'Three Cups' lawsuit
- Naomi Watts to star in Princess Diana biopic
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






