December 9, 2008 7:19 PM
- Text
'Downsizing' Packages Gets Even Sneakier
(MoneyWatch) Pepsico's Tropicana recently redesigned its bottles, with an on-package advertisement touting the new "fresh snap cap." What it didn't tout was that there were seven fewer ounces of orange juice in the bottle -- 89, down from 96 -- though the price remained unchanged.
This, according to Tropicana, had nothing to do with boosting the per-ounce price of the product, but with achieving "optimum configuration" for the bottle, the company told The Today Show, which this morning took a look at "downsizing" -- the practice of food companies furtively making packages smaller rather than just raising prices.
Perhaps the most egregious example cited in the segment was a change to the jars containing Skippy peanut butter. Seen head-on, the old and new jars look identical. But by indenting the bottom of the new jar, Skippy owner Unilever was able to effectively raise the price. "Very sneaky," said Edgar Dworsky, proprietor of the excellent MousePrint.org, who shepherded The Today Show through the world of packaging chicanery.
It costs money to reengineer packages, but food companies have obviously determined that explicit price increases would hurt sales even more than their sneakiness is costing them. The Today Show reported, unsurprisingly, that this year has seen more package-smallering than ever before.
How do consumers feel about all this? "Cheated" one of them said.
This, according to Tropicana, had nothing to do with boosting the per-ounce price of the product, but with achieving "optimum configuration" for the bottle, the company told The Today Show, which this morning took a look at "downsizing" -- the practice of food companies furtively making packages smaller rather than just raising prices.
Perhaps the most egregious example cited in the segment was a change to the jars containing Skippy peanut butter. Seen head-on, the old and new jars look identical. But by indenting the bottom of the new jar, Skippy owner Unilever was able to effectively raise the price. "Very sneaky," said Edgar Dworsky, proprietor of the excellent MousePrint.org, who shepherded The Today Show through the world of packaging chicanery.
It costs money to reengineer packages, but food companies have obviously determined that explicit price increases would hurt sales even more than their sneakiness is costing them. The Today Show reported, unsurprisingly, that this year has seen more package-smallering than ever before.
How do consumers feel about all this? "Cheated" one of them said.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Holliday leads 76ers past short-handed Cavs 99-84
- Nuggets upend Pacers 113-109
- Griffin, Paul lead Clippers over Bobcats 111-86
- Whitney Houston died in Beverly Hills hotel room
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






