March 14, 2008 12:08 PM
- Text
Why Cott Can't Keep Up in Soft Drinks
(MoneyWatch) Theoretically, Cott Co., a maker of discount, store-brand soft drinks, should be doing well. As overall sales of soft drinks continue to drop due to rising prices, logic dictates that consumers should be flocking to lower-priced alternatives.
But they aren't, and that spells trouble for Cott.
Overall, soft-drink sales dropped by 2.3 percent last year, Beverage Digest reported this week. For Cott, sales fell by 8.5 percent, and the company lost 0.3 percent of its market share.
The bad news is likely to continue. Last month, Wal-Mart informed Cott that it was reducing the shelf space it gives to the company, which makes the store brands for Wal-Mart's flagship stores and for its Sam's Club warehouse outlets.
Wal-Mart makes up nearly 40 percent of Cott's sales. It's not yet clear how much shelf space Cott will lose.
Cott is just as vulnerable to rising commodity prices are the dominant players, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. Like them, Cott has had to raise its prices and has lost sales as a result. But soft-drink consumers tend to be brand-loyal, and few Coke- or Pepsi-drinkers have switched to lower-priced alternatives. For one thing, the price gap just isn't wide enough. For another, there are many more alternatives than there used to be.
That's not to say Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are doing well. They have raised their prices by 5 percent in the past year, and their sales of soft-drinks have each fallen 2.7 percent, according to Beverage Digest.
"Ugly stuff," declared Paul Kedrosky on his blog, Infectious Greed.
Like most other food and beverage producers, the soft-drink giants are being squeezed by leaping commodity costs. The resulting higher retail prices have sent consumers scurrying not to discount soft-drink brands, but to alternatives such as "enhanced" water, energy drinks, and tea-based beverages.
Energy drinks are included in the soft-drink category. If they hadn't been, the fall-off in sales might have been far worse, Beverage Digest noted. Energy drinks are among the beverage categories that are on the rise, but they still make up a small percentage of the market.
The trouble is, although both Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have made major forays into alternative beverages in recent years, it hasn't been enough to offset losses in their core products.
But they aren't, and that spells trouble for Cott.
Overall, soft-drink sales dropped by 2.3 percent last year, Beverage Digest reported this week. For Cott, sales fell by 8.5 percent, and the company lost 0.3 percent of its market share.
The bad news is likely to continue. Last month, Wal-Mart informed Cott that it was reducing the shelf space it gives to the company, which makes the store brands for Wal-Mart's flagship stores and for its Sam's Club warehouse outlets.
Wal-Mart makes up nearly 40 percent of Cott's sales. It's not yet clear how much shelf space Cott will lose.
Cott is just as vulnerable to rising commodity prices are the dominant players, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. Like them, Cott has had to raise its prices and has lost sales as a result. But soft-drink consumers tend to be brand-loyal, and few Coke- or Pepsi-drinkers have switched to lower-priced alternatives. For one thing, the price gap just isn't wide enough. For another, there are many more alternatives than there used to be.
That's not to say Coca-Cola and PepsiCo are doing well. They have raised their prices by 5 percent in the past year, and their sales of soft-drinks have each fallen 2.7 percent, according to Beverage Digest.
"Ugly stuff," declared Paul Kedrosky on his blog, Infectious Greed.
Like most other food and beverage producers, the soft-drink giants are being squeezed by leaping commodity costs. The resulting higher retail prices have sent consumers scurrying not to discount soft-drink brands, but to alternatives such as "enhanced" water, energy drinks, and tea-based beverages.
Energy drinks are included in the soft-drink category. If they hadn't been, the fall-off in sales might have been far worse, Beverage Digest noted. Energy drinks are among the beverage categories that are on the rise, but they still make up a small percentage of the market.
The trouble is, although both Coca-Cola and PepsiCo have made major forays into alternative beverages in recent years, it hasn't been enough to offset losses in their core products.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Bahrain rights activist says 2 Americans detained
- Lebanese gunmen clash over Syria crisis
- As Syria burns, neighboring Lebanon feels the heat
- Former President Silva hospitalized in Brazil
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






