January 15, 2010 5:38 PM
- Text
Drowning in FEMA's Flood Insurance
(MoneyWatch) In today's piece on flood insurance, AOL Housing Watch correspondent Charles Feldman raps the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for its shoddy management of the federal flood insurance program that gives insurers a "sweet-heart deal."
These words echo yesterday's BNET Finance report on an Alabama Press-Register story which showed that property casualty insurers were profiting from the program to the tune of millions of dollars. However, AOL's piece, and its subsequent comments, shed new light.
Feldman's thesis is that FEMA is engaging in "mission creep," adding more and more homes to the ones that need to buy this expensive insurance. By creating a one-in-a-hundred-year flood zone, FEMA is forcing homeowners who are very unlikely, even if they let their 30-year mortgage run its course, to ever experience a flood. But they have to buy it anyway, unless their municipality forces FEMA to back down.
That's unlikely, since cash-strapped municipalities are more than happy to use FEMA rules to slap on extra charges that go into their coffers and keep engineers, zoning officers, local surveyors, architects and secretaries employed.
As reported by BNET, flood insurance is supposed to be a wash for insurers. They simply sell the federal insurance at cost. But that doesn't stop them from making money when a flood does occur. They provide the claims adjustors who go out and review the water-logged carpets, fried appliances and washed-away walls to decide how much that insurance is actually going to pay. Claims adjustors are expensive; and their fees become a profit center for insurers like State Farm and Nationwide, the Press-Register claims.
But there are other wrinkles that angry commentators on the AOL story pointed out. Insurers are eager to get out of flood prone areas and on to safer ground. Now they have an excuse. Allstate is apparently telling customers that if they refuse to buy the expensive flood insurance, it will cancel their policies.
And according to AOL readers even mortgage companies are taking their piece of the pie. If you don't ask for flood insurance and pay for it yourself, your mortgage company will buy it for you - and charge a steeper price.
These words echo yesterday's BNET Finance report on an Alabama Press-Register story which showed that property casualty insurers were profiting from the program to the tune of millions of dollars. However, AOL's piece, and its subsequent comments, shed new light.
Feldman's thesis is that FEMA is engaging in "mission creep," adding more and more homes to the ones that need to buy this expensive insurance. By creating a one-in-a-hundred-year flood zone, FEMA is forcing homeowners who are very unlikely, even if they let their 30-year mortgage run its course, to ever experience a flood. But they have to buy it anyway, unless their municipality forces FEMA to back down.
That's unlikely, since cash-strapped municipalities are more than happy to use FEMA rules to slap on extra charges that go into their coffers and keep engineers, zoning officers, local surveyors, architects and secretaries employed.
As reported by BNET, flood insurance is supposed to be a wash for insurers. They simply sell the federal insurance at cost. But that doesn't stop them from making money when a flood does occur. They provide the claims adjustors who go out and review the water-logged carpets, fried appliances and washed-away walls to decide how much that insurance is actually going to pay. Claims adjustors are expensive; and their fees become a profit center for insurers like State Farm and Nationwide, the Press-Register claims.
But there are other wrinkles that angry commentators on the AOL story pointed out. Insurers are eager to get out of flood prone areas and on to safer ground. Now they have an excuse. Allstate is apparently telling customers that if they refuse to buy the expensive flood insurance, it will cancel their policies.
And according to AOL readers even mortgage companies are taking their piece of the pie. If you don't ask for flood insurance and pay for it yourself, your mortgage company will buy it for you - and charge a steeper price.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Faces of protest are as varied as Russia itself
- Mystery disease kills thousands in Central America
- Nowitzki, Terry lead Mavs over Blazers in 2OT
- Richardson hits nine 3s, Magic top Bucks 99-94
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






