November 20, 2009 11:22 AM
- Text
Geithner: Guilty Until Proven Innocent in AIG Debacle
(MoneyWatch) It was damn good theater. The Republican members of Congress's Joint Finance Committee had U.S. Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner on the carpet and were trying to pull the rug out from under him. They blamed him for the American International Group bailout, for giving away too much to AIG's bank
creditors after the bailout, for the state of the economy, for everything in fact but the recent report on mammograms.
Geithner was encouraged to resign by one Texas congressman, a remark that got the GOP's "Deputy Whip" a lot of exposure on both network and cable news. Another said that the former president of the New York Federal Reserve never should have been appointed in the first place.
The Republican pummeling was followed up by a Wall Street Journal editorial suggesting that Geithner knew there was never a risk to the financial system when he agreed to use taxpayer money to pay off what AIG owed in credit default swaps.
Much of the abuse stemmed from TARP Inspector General Neil Barofsky's report released earlier this week, which was highly critical of Geithner and other federal officials. The report said they could have taken a harder stance in negotiating with AIG's creditor banks, and ultimately gotten a better deal.
But Geithner proved he was no punching bag for Congress. When he was asked to resign by GOP Rep. Kevin Brady, Geithner shot back that he inherited the mess from the previous administration's lax regulatory policies - a shot at Brady and the Republican administration of former President George W. Bush.
It's hard to contradict Geithner, since AIG "went rogue" in 2000 when it acquired a savings and loan. That allowed AIG to use the insurers' massive financial resources to get involved in what we now know were risky mortgage-backed securities swaps with investment banks like Goldman Sachs and Deutschebank. By operating this unit out of London, AIG had virtually no regulation from the Office of Thrift Supervision. Both AIG's board and shareholders were happy to leave it alone to earn money.
But in 2008 the mess fell into Geithner's lap and he made several judgment calls. First rescue AIG, and then pay off its debts. Were they the right moves? It's easy to second-guess. The one thing that is certain is that he took swift, decisive action and the financial system didn't fail. And in hindsight, we will never know if it would have.
creditors after the bailout, for the state of the economy, for everything in fact but the recent report on mammograms.Geithner was encouraged to resign by one Texas congressman, a remark that got the GOP's "Deputy Whip" a lot of exposure on both network and cable news. Another said that the former president of the New York Federal Reserve never should have been appointed in the first place.
The Republican pummeling was followed up by a Wall Street Journal editorial suggesting that Geithner knew there was never a risk to the financial system when he agreed to use taxpayer money to pay off what AIG owed in credit default swaps.
Much of the abuse stemmed from TARP Inspector General Neil Barofsky's report released earlier this week, which was highly critical of Geithner and other federal officials. The report said they could have taken a harder stance in negotiating with AIG's creditor banks, and ultimately gotten a better deal.
But Geithner proved he was no punching bag for Congress. When he was asked to resign by GOP Rep. Kevin Brady, Geithner shot back that he inherited the mess from the previous administration's lax regulatory policies - a shot at Brady and the Republican administration of former President George W. Bush.
It's hard to contradict Geithner, since AIG "went rogue" in 2000 when it acquired a savings and loan. That allowed AIG to use the insurers' massive financial resources to get involved in what we now know were risky mortgage-backed securities swaps with investment banks like Goldman Sachs and Deutschebank. By operating this unit out of London, AIG had virtually no regulation from the Office of Thrift Supervision. Both AIG's board and shareholders were happy to leave it alone to earn money.
But in 2008 the mess fell into Geithner's lap and he made several judgment calls. First rescue AIG, and then pay off its debts. Were they the right moves? It's easy to second-guess. The one thing that is certain is that he took swift, decisive action and the financial system didn't fail. And in hindsight, we will never know if it would have.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Nationwide foreclosure pact gains momentum
- Board shake-up at Yahoo
- Fed: Consumer borrowing sees strong growth
- Greek debt talks drag on, banks signal progress
- Dow approaches 13,000, one rally from a record
- Market braces for federal budget battle
- How to handle passive aggressive employees | Leila's House of Corrections
- 4 ways to overcome price resistance on sales
- New York, Calif. holding out foreclosure settlement
- Bernanke sticks with low-rate policy at hearing
- Job openings up: Here's how to get one yourself
- Apple patent throws wrench into Facebook plans
- Yum! Brands forecasts strong expansion overseas
- Cash balance retirement plans: Annuity options
- Tax prep tips: Jill Schlesinger makes it easy
- Why is Greece negotiating over debt when it could be dictating?
- Job openings jump to a near 3-year high
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Prosecutors want Sandusky kept indoors pre-trial
- Study: Ocean fish may have freshwater ancestor
- Oil rises to near $99 after US crude supply drop
- Asia stocks up following surge on Wall Street
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






