November 12, 2009 6:25 PM
- Text
State Farm Backed by Federal Court in Wind Versus Water Case
(MoneyWatch) As ex-Tropical Storm Ida chugs up the East Coast with flood water surging in on the Atlantic states, insurers like State Farm, Allstate and Travelers bask in the warm glow of a federal court decision this week backing their version of what happens when a major storm hits the U.S.
Property insurers such as State Farm pay claims based on wind damage. Water damage payout comes from the federal flood insurance program, which offers only limited coverage.
Not surprisingly, when a hurricane hits homeowners like to put in a claim with their private insurer because they pay more. Also not surprising, these insurers try to duck and dodge whenever possible, claiming that water was responsible rather than wind.
That's exactly what happened to the Reginald Bossier family in Biloxi, Mississippi, whose one-story home was destroyed by Hurricane Katrina in 2005. That storm, which carried a 135-mile-per-hour wallop, as well as a wave of water that leaped up to 30 feet, hit so hard that almost everyone evacuated before hand, so there were no witnesses to how the Bossier home was wrecked.
State Farm said water destroyed it; Bossier said the winds came first. Bossier won when the Mississippi State Supreme Court said that an insurance company can deny coverage only if it proves that water caused the loss.
But state courts tend to look kindly on state residents. A U.S. district court this week took a different tack. A jury there denied Bossier the $650,000 he was asking for, so he wound up with a much smaller amount.
Since federal courts mostly trump state courts, and a Mississippi decision doesn't extend beyond the state limits, insurers can breathe easy, knowing that however much it rains, it won't hurt their checkbooks that much.
As for homeowners who want to prove that it's wind and not water that knocked down their homes, it seems that their only option is to hang around for the hurricane, snap some pictures, and high tail it out of there in a hurry.
Property insurers such as State Farm pay claims based on wind damage. Water damage payout comes from the federal flood insurance program, which offers only limited coverage.
Not surprisingly, when a hurricane hits homeowners like to put in a claim with their private insurer because they pay more. Also not surprising, these insurers try to duck and dodge whenever possible, claiming that water was responsible rather than wind.
That's exactly what happened to the Reginald Bossier family in Biloxi, Mississippi, whose one-story home was destroyed by Hurricane Katrina in 2005. That storm, which carried a 135-mile-per-hour wallop, as well as a wave of water that leaped up to 30 feet, hit so hard that almost everyone evacuated before hand, so there were no witnesses to how the Bossier home was wrecked.
State Farm said water destroyed it; Bossier said the winds came first. Bossier won when the Mississippi State Supreme Court said that an insurance company can deny coverage only if it proves that water caused the loss.
But state courts tend to look kindly on state residents. A U.S. district court this week took a different tack. A jury there denied Bossier the $650,000 he was asking for, so he wound up with a much smaller amount.
Since federal courts mostly trump state courts, and a Mississippi decision doesn't extend beyond the state limits, insurers can breathe easy, knowing that however much it rains, it won't hurt their checkbooks that much.
As for homeowners who want to prove that it's wind and not water that knocked down their homes, it seems that their only option is to hang around for the hurricane, snap some pictures, and high tail it out of there in a hurry.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Big banks, gov't officials strike $25B deal
- LinkedIn swings back to profit
- LinkedIn doubles revenue, beats growth estimates
- Kodak to stop making digital cameras, frames
- Market cap, schmarket cap, Apple still gets no respect
- Philip Morris Int'l income up nearly 8 percent
- Survey: Small biz plans big hires in 2012
- Freddie Mac: Mortgages inch higher but stay low
- Will the European debt crisis sink Obama's re-election?
- Banks in $25B deal to settle foreclosure abuses
- Joe Coffee: Scaling up without selling your soul
- Greek agreement accomplishes nothing
- 401K plans: New rules make costs clearer
- Are women leaders selling themselves short?
- Ask the Experts: New 401(k) rules
- Mortgage lenders strike a deal
- $25B foreclosure-abuse settlement reached
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- NYSE Euronext profit down on blocked merger costs
- Why Bank of America is the new Citigroup
- Barclays bank profit down 15 pct in 2011
- France's Total gets oil price profit boost
on Facebook
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
on CBS News






