May 5, 2009 4:53 PM
- Text
MetLife: One of the Best Banks May Be an Insurance Company
(MoneyWatch) While official results of the Obama administration's stress test on the nation's biggest financial institutions won't be released until Thursday evening, the unofficial results were leaked this morning. What's interesting is not only the list of 10 needy banks that will likely have to boost their capital, but also who's not on it: MetLife, the nation's largest life insurer.
MetLife is not only an insurer but also a bank, because, like many insurers, it bought a bank earlier in its life to enable it to diversify. But unlike banks such as Wells Fargo, Bank of America and Citigroup that are apparently on the distressed list, it never got into any trouble.
Despite the fact that MetLife is the nation's largest life insurer, with assets of more than half a trillion dollars, it has managed to stay under the radar where scandal is concerned. Its claim to fame is that, in bad situations, it avoids the limelight.
When rating agency Standard & Poor's put 23 banks on Creditwatch yesterday with negative implications (meaning they could be downgraded at least one notch within 90 days), many of the nation's biggest financial institutions were among them, including those taking Obama's stress test. MetLife was not.
Again, when life insurers, including Hartford Financial and Prudential, went to the U.S. Treasury Department earlier this year begging for TARP funds, MetLife was not among them. Even though MetLife technically qualified for federal assistance (as the owner of a bank), the New York-based insurer said it didn't want the money. MetLife CEO Rob Henrikson even laughed when the question was asked by an analyst, saying MetLife had no need for the money.
The market's reaction yesterday to news that banks would need even more of a federal bailout was to send bank stocks soaring, an indication, at least to some, that the Bear Market may be ending.
Well, perhaps. But instead of buying stocks in need of transfusions, it might make sense to take a look at staid old MetLife, which has been bumping along at around $28 a share. It took a hit in April when it said it wouldn't take TARP funds, and another after it reported earnings last week that were below expectations.
But isn't there something to be said for being solid? Isn't that what a "bank" is supposed to be?
MetLife is not only an insurer but also a bank, because, like many insurers, it bought a bank earlier in its life to enable it to diversify. But unlike banks such as Wells Fargo, Bank of America and Citigroup that are apparently on the distressed list, it never got into any trouble.
Despite the fact that MetLife is the nation's largest life insurer, with assets of more than half a trillion dollars, it has managed to stay under the radar where scandal is concerned. Its claim to fame is that, in bad situations, it avoids the limelight.
When rating agency Standard & Poor's put 23 banks on Creditwatch yesterday with negative implications (meaning they could be downgraded at least one notch within 90 days), many of the nation's biggest financial institutions were among them, including those taking Obama's stress test. MetLife was not.
Again, when life insurers, including Hartford Financial and Prudential, went to the U.S. Treasury Department earlier this year begging for TARP funds, MetLife was not among them. Even though MetLife technically qualified for federal assistance (as the owner of a bank), the New York-based insurer said it didn't want the money. MetLife CEO Rob Henrikson even laughed when the question was asked by an analyst, saying MetLife had no need for the money.
The market's reaction yesterday to news that banks would need even more of a federal bailout was to send bank stocks soaring, an indication, at least to some, that the Bear Market may be ending.
Well, perhaps. But instead of buying stocks in need of transfusions, it might make sense to take a look at staid old MetLife, which has been bumping along at around $28 a share. It took a hit in April when it said it wouldn't take TARP funds, and another after it reported earnings last week that were below expectations.
But isn't there something to be said for being solid? Isn't that what a "bank" is supposed to be?
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Czech president to be elected in public vote
- Czech president to be elected in public vote
- Barbie's wardrobe celebrated at Fashion Week bash
- Spain: arrests at anti-labor market reform protest
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
on CBS News






