April 29, 2009 11:06 AM
- Text
Could Credit Card Outrage Impact Insurers?
(MoneyWatch) It's no accident that the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), the U.S. insurance industry's regulators, will hold a hearing tomorrow on the use of "credit scoring."
The announcement follows closely on the heels of President Obama's meeting with the executives of banks that issue credit cards at which he told them to stop gouging customers with high interest rates and misleading offers.
Obama read the tea leaves very clearly. In a recession, and with the average American carrying more than $9,000 in high-interest credit card debt, the credit card companies are an easy target for public outrage.
How does this impact insurance companies? Property casualty insurers such as Allstate, Travelers and State Farm write the policies that cover the cars and homes of these same Americans and use "credit scoring" to decide the rates and whether to offer coverage.
People get lower credit scores when their debt goes up or they don't pay their bills. This hurts them twice. Not only do they get charged more by the credit card company; they also get hit with a higher insurance bill for their home and car.
Insurers defend "credit scoring" as a valid predictor of claims. For example, if you're worried about losing your job you are more likely to get into an accident. A home in disrepair, because the owner can't pay the bills, is more likely to have an electrical fire.
But other valid predictors have been outlawed because they run counter to public policy. One of them was "redlining," which banks used to decide who got a mortgage. It allowed them to refuse to lend to inner-city residents.
For now, credit scoring is allowed in most states. But the NAIC hearing will be closely watched in Connecticut and Minnesota, where bills are circulating which, if enacted, could either restrict or ban insurers' use of credit-based insurance scoring. Consumer advocates have long railed against credit scoring as a tax on the poor.
Just how seriously the industry views this threat is seen by the fact that Insurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig will defend credit scoring at the hearing. He'll cite information from FICO, which provides predictive analytics to banks and insurers, saying Americans' credit scores have actually improved as they've paid down their debt during the current recession.
The announcement follows closely on the heels of President Obama's meeting with the executives of banks that issue credit cards at which he told them to stop gouging customers with high interest rates and misleading offers.
Obama read the tea leaves very clearly. In a recession, and with the average American carrying more than $9,000 in high-interest credit card debt, the credit card companies are an easy target for public outrage.
How does this impact insurance companies? Property casualty insurers such as Allstate, Travelers and State Farm write the policies that cover the cars and homes of these same Americans and use "credit scoring" to decide the rates and whether to offer coverage.
People get lower credit scores when their debt goes up or they don't pay their bills. This hurts them twice. Not only do they get charged more by the credit card company; they also get hit with a higher insurance bill for their home and car.
Insurers defend "credit scoring" as a valid predictor of claims. For example, if you're worried about losing your job you are more likely to get into an accident. A home in disrepair, because the owner can't pay the bills, is more likely to have an electrical fire.
But other valid predictors have been outlawed because they run counter to public policy. One of them was "redlining," which banks used to decide who got a mortgage. It allowed them to refuse to lend to inner-city residents.
For now, credit scoring is allowed in most states. But the NAIC hearing will be closely watched in Connecticut and Minnesota, where bills are circulating which, if enacted, could either restrict or ban insurers' use of credit-based insurance scoring. Consumer advocates have long railed against credit scoring as a tax on the poor.
Just how seriously the industry views this threat is seen by the fact that Insurance Information Institute President Robert Hartwig will defend credit scoring at the hearing. He'll cite information from FICO, which provides predictive analytics to banks and insurers, saying Americans' credit scores have actually improved as they've paid down their debt during the current recession.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Grizzlies end 3-game skid, beat Timberwolves 85-80
- Grizzlies end 3-game skid, beat Timberwolves 85-80
- Chef Jesse Schenker, wife Lindsay's Val Day dish
- Nowitzki scores 25 in Mavs' 105-95 win vs. Nuggets
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






