April 8, 2009 9:18 PM
- Text
Will Congress Buy Into More Bailouts for Insurers?
(MoneyWatch) It's official. Well, semi-official, anyway. Ailing life insurers are in line for a big chunk of the $130 billion in TARP funds, according to a story leaked by U.S. Treasury officials to the Wall Street Journal. And Treasury may be trying to soften the blow by leaking it rather than stating it.
Life insurers like Lincoln National and Hartford have been buying up savings and loans since last year with the expectation that they could get some of this money. But will Congress get in line? Our esteemed representatives have been hammered by the public because of the $170 billion given to American International Group (AIG) and the way much of that money wound its way to investment banks like Goldman Sachs, not to mention undeserving AIG executives who helped run the company into the ground.
Is Congress now ready to give money to insurance executives whose failures last year were rewarded with multimillion dollar paychecks? Prudential's CEO alone made $14 million.
There's a case to be made for both sides. One can argue that life insurers have dug themselves into a deep hole because their stock portfolios have taken as much as a 40 percent hit. True, that's the same beating as Joe Sixpack's 401k, but Joe won't get repeated downgrades from credit rating agencies. And it was those downgrades, coming at the worst possible time, which caused AIG to self-destruct.
So the life insurers will argue that it's not their fault and if they don't get help, we could start seeing serious defaults in companies that are (here we go again) too big to fail.
The counterargument is that this situation looks a little too much like AIG redux. Just like AIG the life insurers have bought up thrifts and seem to be claiming that they are not insurers anymore, but banks. The freedom to escape insurance regulation is exactly what got AIG into trouble.
Even though most life insurers didn't dabble in credit default swaps as AIG did, they've been selling variable annuities, which guaranteed returns that are now unrealistic. Guaranteeing returns on a stock market portfolio in a down market is as dangerous as any other form of gambling, unless the seller is properly hedged.
Unfortunately we may not know that until the lifers report first quarter earnings later this month. And by then, they may have already gotten their piece of the TARP.
Life insurers like Lincoln National and Hartford have been buying up savings and loans since last year with the expectation that they could get some of this money. But will Congress get in line? Our esteemed representatives have been hammered by the public because of the $170 billion given to American International Group (AIG) and the way much of that money wound its way to investment banks like Goldman Sachs, not to mention undeserving AIG executives who helped run the company into the ground.
Is Congress now ready to give money to insurance executives whose failures last year were rewarded with multimillion dollar paychecks? Prudential's CEO alone made $14 million.
There's a case to be made for both sides. One can argue that life insurers have dug themselves into a deep hole because their stock portfolios have taken as much as a 40 percent hit. True, that's the same beating as Joe Sixpack's 401k, but Joe won't get repeated downgrades from credit rating agencies. And it was those downgrades, coming at the worst possible time, which caused AIG to self-destruct.
So the life insurers will argue that it's not their fault and if they don't get help, we could start seeing serious defaults in companies that are (here we go again) too big to fail.
The counterargument is that this situation looks a little too much like AIG redux. Just like AIG the life insurers have bought up thrifts and seem to be claiming that they are not insurers anymore, but banks. The freedom to escape insurance regulation is exactly what got AIG into trouble.
Even though most life insurers didn't dabble in credit default swaps as AIG did, they've been selling variable annuities, which guaranteed returns that are now unrealistic. Guaranteeing returns on a stock market portfolio in a down market is as dangerous as any other form of gambling, unless the seller is properly hedged.
Unfortunately we may not know that until the lifers report first quarter earnings later this month. And by then, they may have already gotten their piece of the TARP.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Boeing says it's frustrated with Dreamliner glitch
- Officials: Gaza man killed in Israeli airstrike
- Gunmen kill provincial judge, child in Afghanistan
- Boeing says it's frustrated with Dreamliner glitch
on Facebook
- Whitney Houston 1963-2012
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- "Phantom" star sings on "CBS This Morning: Saturday"
on CBS News






