March 17, 2009 9:32 AM
- Text
AIG's Biggest Victim Could Be Other Life Insurers
(MoneyWatch) Let's get serious. The lynch mob that's out to hang those American International Group (AIG) executives with their $165 million in bonuses is going to fail.
First of all, their rope is too short to reach across the Atlantic Ocean. The fat bonus checks have already been delivered to traders in AIG's Financial Products unit, which is based in London. Chances are these Brits are now at the pub, three sheets to the wind, laughing at the outrage from across the pond that they are viewing on the telly. So playing the shame game by naming them, as New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo suggests, isn't going to work.
And neither are legal measures. The contracts are valid. For the U.S. itself to break a contract would be equivalent to defaulting on a Treasury bond. And that's not going to happen.
So who is going to get hurt? Quite possibly other insurers, and particularly life insurers. It is no secret that 12 lifers are lined up, tin cup in hand, looking for money from the TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) fund. Frank Keating, president of the American Council of Life Insurers, refuses to name names, but they are apparently some of the biggest, including Prudential and Hartford. Earlier in the month Keating suggested that action could come "in the next several weeks."
Will they get a blank check from the Treasury the way AIG did several months ago? Not bloody likely. Their argument, as reported on BNET Financial in January , is that they've taken huge losses on their investment portfolios and need to shore up their capital in order to pay claims. But that soap did not wash when they took their complaints to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, the quasi-regulatory body for the U.S. insurance industry, back in January.
The NAIC, led by New York State Insurance Superintendent Eric Dinallo, turned them down. Are they expecting a better reception from a Congress, president and treasury secretary already battered for letting AIG get away with so much? The life insurers may want to insure themselves; the lynch mob is heading their way.
First of all, their rope is too short to reach across the Atlantic Ocean. The fat bonus checks have already been delivered to traders in AIG's Financial Products unit, which is based in London. Chances are these Brits are now at the pub, three sheets to the wind, laughing at the outrage from across the pond that they are viewing on the telly. So playing the shame game by naming them, as New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo suggests, isn't going to work.
And neither are legal measures. The contracts are valid. For the U.S. itself to break a contract would be equivalent to defaulting on a Treasury bond. And that's not going to happen.
So who is going to get hurt? Quite possibly other insurers, and particularly life insurers. It is no secret that 12 lifers are lined up, tin cup in hand, looking for money from the TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) fund. Frank Keating, president of the American Council of Life Insurers, refuses to name names, but they are apparently some of the biggest, including Prudential and Hartford. Earlier in the month Keating suggested that action could come "in the next several weeks."
Will they get a blank check from the Treasury the way AIG did several months ago? Not bloody likely. Their argument, as reported on BNET Financial in January , is that they've taken huge losses on their investment portfolios and need to shore up their capital in order to pay claims. But that soap did not wash when they took their complaints to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, the quasi-regulatory body for the U.S. insurance industry, back in January.
The NAIC, led by New York State Insurance Superintendent Eric Dinallo, turned them down. Are they expecting a better reception from a Congress, president and treasury secretary already battered for letting AIG get away with so much? The life insurers may want to insure themselves; the lynch mob is heading their way.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Crawford leads Trail Blazers past Hornets, 94-86
- Grizzlies upend Pacers 98-92
- Lin scores 38 to lead Knicks over Lakers 92-85
- Mavericks hold off T-wolves 104-97 behind Nowitzki
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






