February 25, 2009 11:46 AM
- Text
Who Will Flunk the "Stress Test?"
(MoneyWatch) Who will fail the "stress test?"
Good question. The Obama administration will soon be checking a number of the country's largest banks which have received some of the $700 billion federal bailout money.
The feds want to know whether the banks have sufficient capital and enough different types to sustain any more economic blasts. Another goal is to assess whether the banks can use extra public money to start lending to customers again and help move the country out of recession.
Federal Reserve Chief Ben Bernanke insists that a bank can't "pass" or "fail" the stress test. Rather, it's a kind of "Come to Jesus" moment to see just how healthy the banks are.
And, it's an effort to tear past a veil of secrecy that banks have deployed even after they have gotten public bailouts. Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, told a House subcommittee yesterday that a mere 5 percent of banks that have gotten bailouts have bothered to respond to a federal request for information about how they have spent the money. That's right. An incredibly tiny 5 percent. Old attitudes do die hard.
Who's the most likely not to succeed the stress test? Financial blogger Peter Cohan says the three likeliest candidates are the ones with the lowest stock prices. They are Citigroup, Bank of America and Cincinnati's Fifth Third bank. Here are his reasons:
The stress test, however, does make sense as examples of rescues in other countries show. Sweden performed similar triage on its banks during its crisis nearly 20 years ago. By identifying troubled banks, the Stockholm government was able to move fast to rescue its financial system Japan failed to do it until it was way too late and paid a huge price.
Good question. The Obama administration will soon be checking a number of the country's largest banks which have received some of the $700 billion federal bailout money.
The feds want to know whether the banks have sufficient capital and enough different types to sustain any more economic blasts. Another goal is to assess whether the banks can use extra public money to start lending to customers again and help move the country out of recession.
Federal Reserve Chief Ben Bernanke insists that a bank can't "pass" or "fail" the stress test. Rather, it's a kind of "Come to Jesus" moment to see just how healthy the banks are.
And, it's an effort to tear past a veil of secrecy that banks have deployed even after they have gotten public bailouts. Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, told a House subcommittee yesterday that a mere 5 percent of banks that have gotten bailouts have bothered to respond to a federal request for information about how they have spent the money. That's right. An incredibly tiny 5 percent. Old attitudes do die hard.
Who's the most likely not to succeed the stress test? Financial blogger Peter Cohan says the three likeliest candidates are the ones with the lowest stock prices. They are Citigroup, Bank of America and Cincinnati's Fifth Third bank. Here are his reasons:
- Citi was trading at around $2.35 a share this morning and is in such bad shape that it is talking about converting $45 billion in preferred stock into common stock that the feds would own. Some would call that nationalization.
- Bank of America was trading at around $4.37 a share and has suffered quite a fall after Chief Kenneth Lewis took over both Countrywide Financial and Merrill Lynch. Those entities are swollen with toxic assets.
- Fifth Third trades at about a buck and a quarter, lost $2 billion last year and has received $3.4 billion in TARP money.
The stress test, however, does make sense as examples of rescues in other countries show. Sweden performed similar triage on its banks during its crisis nearly 20 years ago. By identifying troubled banks, the Stockholm government was able to move fast to rescue its financial system Japan failed to do it until it was way too late and paid a huge price.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Exhibit looks back at 50 years of American fashion
- Man pleads guilty in NYC to harassing Ivanka Trump
- Mortenson asks judge to toss 'Three Cups' lawsuit
- Naomi Watts to star in Princess Diana biopic
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






