December 5, 2008 7:28 PM
- Text
Banks Should Consider Mobile, But Keep it Simple
(MoneyWatch) Banks are goin' mobile.
Citibank, U.S. Bank, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, BancorpSouth, and most recently Regions Bank are already offering access to accounts and a variety of other services through rapidly advancing and ubiquitous mobile devices. And in the United Kingdom, banking via mobile is growing at a faster clip among consumers than the adoption of credit cards, online banking or ATMs, according to a report released Dec. 5 by U.K. forecaster Monitise PLC.
The sharp rise in iPhone and Blackberry sales in the latter half of this year is likely to drive further interest from banks and their customers, who'll want to see how they do with managing their money on the move.
But with little guaranteed short-term return on investment, banks need to tread carefully with mobile banking services -- focusing on services that leverage what makes mobile unique and for which they could potentially charge a fee. In a recent article in Bank Director magazine, Aite Group analyst Nick Holland opines that "there's not a great deal in terms of immediate revenue-generating potential [on mobile banking]. It's about accessing information."
In the early days of Internet banking more than a decade ago, banks could easily stick a toe in the water with a one-size-fits-all web site and online account access. Offering mobile access is a whole different story. Upfront development and integration costs much more due to the wide array of mobile devices and form factors -- a list of cleared checks or a bill payment screen is going to look a lot different on an iPhone than it will on a three-year-old Nokia. Wannabe-3G banks will also pay monthly per-user fees to their mobile banking service provider and regular per-user or per-transaction fees to whichever wireless carrier is handing off their customer's data or voice call.
U.S. banks are right to embrace mobile, but they'll need to keep it simple. Access through this channel will deliver banks closer ties to a new generation of customers who are typically eschewing a stagnant screen for their smartphone to do work and get information.
Successful new services will sidestep customers' expectations that reviewing checking account information and paying bills should be free, as it typically is through Internet banking. For example, banks may not charge for basic mobile bill payment, but they might levy a fee for expedited payments or for alerts to help them keep tabs on their accounts -- something that would arguably be useful to folks in these belt-tightening times.
Citibank, U.S. Bank, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, BancorpSouth, and most recently Regions Bank are already offering access to accounts and a variety of other services through rapidly advancing and ubiquitous mobile devices. And in the United Kingdom, banking via mobile is growing at a faster clip among consumers than the adoption of credit cards, online banking or ATMs, according to a report released Dec. 5 by U.K. forecaster Monitise PLC.
The sharp rise in iPhone and Blackberry sales in the latter half of this year is likely to drive further interest from banks and their customers, who'll want to see how they do with managing their money on the move.
But with little guaranteed short-term return on investment, banks need to tread carefully with mobile banking services -- focusing on services that leverage what makes mobile unique and for which they could potentially charge a fee. In a recent article in Bank Director magazine, Aite Group analyst Nick Holland opines that "there's not a great deal in terms of immediate revenue-generating potential [on mobile banking]. It's about accessing information."
In the early days of Internet banking more than a decade ago, banks could easily stick a toe in the water with a one-size-fits-all web site and online account access. Offering mobile access is a whole different story. Upfront development and integration costs much more due to the wide array of mobile devices and form factors -- a list of cleared checks or a bill payment screen is going to look a lot different on an iPhone than it will on a three-year-old Nokia. Wannabe-3G banks will also pay monthly per-user fees to their mobile banking service provider and regular per-user or per-transaction fees to whichever wireless carrier is handing off their customer's data or voice call.
U.S. banks are right to embrace mobile, but they'll need to keep it simple. Access through this channel will deliver banks closer ties to a new generation of customers who are typically eschewing a stagnant screen for their smartphone to do work and get information.
Successful new services will sidestep customers' expectations that reviewing checking account information and paying bills should be free, as it typically is through Internet banking. For example, banks may not charge for basic mobile bill payment, but they might levy a fee for expedited payments or for alerts to help them keep tabs on their accounts -- something that would arguably be useful to folks in these belt-tightening times.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Lin scores 38 to lead Knicks over Lakers 92-85
- Mavericks hold off T-wolves 104-97 behind Nowitzki
- Crawford leads Trail Blazers past Hornets, 94-86
- Jennings' 24 lifts Bucks past Cavs 113-112 in OT
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






