July 11, 2008 6:37 PM
- Text
Death To Fannie Won't Kill Mortgages
(MoneyWatch)
Is the furor about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac overstated? Sure, Fannie's share price is down 80 percent in a year (Freddie's even more). But in the same year, Citigroup, Lehman and Merrill Lynch are down almost as much. So Fannie and Freddie have lots of company.
Of course, the big fear is that the "mortgage giants" will fail and the mortgage market will collapse. That fear, I believe, is wildly exaggerated.
First, the mortgage giants are no giants. Together they have about 11,000 employees. Bank of America has that many -- plus another 200,000. In market cap, which of course is much lower than before, they total $15 billion. In short, even together they are smaller by most measure than the companies at the bottom of the Fortune 500.
Of course, we are told, Fannie and Freddie guaranty something like $5 trillion in mortgages and their failure could devastate housing markets. That's a big number. But whenever anyone talks about derivatives, and Fannie and Freddie are in the derivatives business, numbers get big fast. They get meaningless even faster.
If Fannie and Freddie went under, there would still be banks and banks would still write mortgages. The secondary market in mortgages would hiccup badly, but it wouldn't die.
The proof is the existence of "jumbo" mortgages. Until recently, Fannie and Freddie only packaged "conforming" mortgages. Any loan over $417,000 (the number varied) was out of bounds. Even many smaller loans did not "conform" for one reason or another. To be sure, the interest rate on conforming loans was less -- but not a lot less, maybe an eight or a quarter or a point.
So Fannie and Freddie may be the cause of some of that spread, but I doubt they cause all of it. The big fact is that millions of folks have long gotten mortgages without the help of the mortgage giants. Whatever the fate of Fannie and Freddie, the mortgage market will not die.
And now a message from our sponsor: Like what you've read here? Hate it? Think BNET can be better? Let us know! Email us directly, or take the Help Us Build a Better BNET poll on BNET Intercom.
Is the furor about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac overstated? Sure, Fannie's share price is down 80 percent in a year (Freddie's even more). But in the same year, Citigroup, Lehman and Merrill Lynch are down almost as much. So Fannie and Freddie have lots of company.Of course, the big fear is that the "mortgage giants" will fail and the mortgage market will collapse. That fear, I believe, is wildly exaggerated.
First, the mortgage giants are no giants. Together they have about 11,000 employees. Bank of America has that many -- plus another 200,000. In market cap, which of course is much lower than before, they total $15 billion. In short, even together they are smaller by most measure than the companies at the bottom of the Fortune 500.Of course, we are told, Fannie and Freddie guaranty something like $5 trillion in mortgages and their failure could devastate housing markets. That's a big number. But whenever anyone talks about derivatives, and Fannie and Freddie are in the derivatives business, numbers get big fast. They get meaningless even faster.
If Fannie and Freddie went under, there would still be banks and banks would still write mortgages. The secondary market in mortgages would hiccup badly, but it wouldn't die.
The proof is the existence of "jumbo" mortgages. Until recently, Fannie and Freddie only packaged "conforming" mortgages. Any loan over $417,000 (the number varied) was out of bounds. Even many smaller loans did not "conform" for one reason or another. To be sure, the interest rate on conforming loans was less -- but not a lot less, maybe an eight or a quarter or a point.
So Fannie and Freddie may be the cause of some of that spread, but I doubt they cause all of it. The big fact is that millions of folks have long gotten mortgages without the help of the mortgage giants. Whatever the fate of Fannie and Freddie, the mortgage market will not die.
And now a message from our sponsor: Like what you've read here? Hate it? Think BNET can be better? Let us know! Email us directly, or take the Help Us Build a Better BNET poll on BNET Intercom.
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
- 6 things never to say in a performance review
- $26B mortgage deal: Who gets the money?
- Friendly's CEO steps down
- Quarterly loss hits $3.3B at Postal Service
- Greeks rail against cuts as EU demands more
- 6 things you should never share on Facebook
- Make moves now to increase financial aid
- Valentine's Day: 9 places to save
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Mortenson asks judge to toss 'Three Cups' lawsuit
- Naomi Watts to star in Princess Diana biopic
- BCBG offers soothing start to NY Fashion Week
- Heather Mills says McCartney calls were hacked
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News






