AP/ December 24, 2011, 7:25 AM

Gingrich, Perry fail to make Va. ballot

Republican presidential candidates Rick Perry (right), Texas Governor, and Newt Gingrich CBS News/National Journal foreign policy debate at the Benjamin Johnson Arena, Saturday, Nov. 12, 2011 in Spartanburg, S.C.

Republican presidential candidates Rick Perry (right), Texas Governor, and Newt Gingrich CBS News/National Journal foreign policy debate at the Benjamin Johnson Arena, Saturday, Nov. 12, 2011 in Spartanburg, S.C. / CBS

WASHINGTON — Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has failed to qualify for Virginia's March 6 Republican primary, a development that complicates his bid to win the GOP presidential nomination.

"After verification, RPV has determined that Newt Gingrich did not submit required 10K signatures and has not qualified for the VA primary," the Republican Party of Virginia announced early Saturday on its Twitter website.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry also fell short of the 10,000 signatures of registered voters required for a candidate's name to be on the primary ballot, but former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Texas Rep. Ron Paul will be on the ballot.

State GOP spokesman Garren Shipley said volunteers spent Friday validating petitions that the four candidates submitted by the Thursday 5 p.m. deadline to the State Board of Elections. Shipley was not available early Saturday to discuss the announcement posted on the website.

Failing to get on the ballot will be a major setback for Gingrich, who has tried to use his recent upsurge in popularity to make up for a late organizing start. Ironically, Gingrich had a slight lead over Romney, with others farther back, in a Quinnipiac poll of Virginia Republicans released earlier in the week.

The load of catching up on organizing work and a lack of advertising money to counter an onslaught of negative ads from his rivals have been major disadvantages.

Gingrich had to leave New Hampshire on Wednesday and race to Virginia, where he needed 10,000 valid voters' signatures to secure a spot on the ballot.

He said Wednesday he had enough ballot signatures, but he wanted to come to Virginia to deliver them personally. Taking no chances, his volunteers asked everyone to sign petitions before entering Gingrich's rally Wednesday night in Arlington, just across the Potomac River from Washington.

Gingrich's early-December rise in several polls gave him renewed hopes of carrying his campaign deep into the primary season. Failure to compete in Virginia, which is among the "Super Tuesday" primaries, would deal a huge blow to any contender who had not locked up the nomination by then.

The state party's Shipley said the party was validating petitions the candidates submitted by the Thursday 5 p.m. deadline to the state elections board. It began validating signatures Friday morning.

The 10,000 registered voters must also include 400 signatures from each of Virginia's 11 congressional districts.

It was unclear if Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum or former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman submitted petitions to the state board.

Meanwhile, Virginia's Democrats said President Barack Obama's re-election campaign gathered enough signatures to get him on the state's primary ballot though he was the only candidate who qualified.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
122 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Concerned2009 says:
Politics as usual. Won't be much of a primary if only Romney and Paul are on the ballot.
Rather than complain about the candidates why not concentrate on the real issues that NEED to be discussed.
1. Balanced Budget Amendment - we can't afford what we're doing now.
2. Bring the troops home - stop being the world police force
3. Line item veto for the president - to control the do nothing Congress
4. Eliminate the existing tax code for a 15% flat tax.
5. Let Israel fight it's own battle for once.
6. Secure the southern borders from the drug cartels.
7. Term limits for the House and Congress - just like the Presidency.

Give me a realistic candidate to discuss those issues and the 10K signatures won't be a problem again.
reply
retiredgustav replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
I can agree with everything except the flat tax. I don't want to give the top 1% a tax cut. Better yet lets just cut out the loopholes.
monkeywart replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
if i had to give 60% to the us government then why would i take the risk of investing it? lets say i have a 50 - 50 chance of a good investment. Well lets say i succeed and the investment gets me 10% profit so on 100 dollars i make 104 dollars after taxes. No lets say that same investment loses 10 percent so now i only have 90 dollars so
win - 4$
lose - 10$
this is on a 50-50 investment.
what will happen. no one will invest in america.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
longtree-2009 says:
let's not forget obama is no bargain either. not a fan of newt or perry or obama, but keep it real. none of them, including obama, are anything to write home about no matter where you live. it will be a case of voting for the lesser evil, as usual.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
fedup12 says:
A vote for any of the dudes with an R behind their name is a vote for the Bush Cheney interventionist world police foreign policy.

Well except for Ron Paul.
reply
involved_indi replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
A vote for the current holder of the office is a vote for a socialist economic policy that is currently being thrown on the scrap heap of history everywhere else in the world and a vote for a leaderless, muddled, apologetic foreign policy at a time when true leadership is required.
fedup12 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Barack foreign policy is more precise and (more bang for the buck) than Bush's
But I still dont think we need it anymore.

This America attitude(we are the only ones who can do anything and we ARE the worlds police)

Has been the R policy since Reagan. Essentially for them NO money spent on the military and smackin someone down is bad money.

Time to reverse that paradigm!

If it takes a guy like Ron Paul to do it I will vote for him.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
saturn05 says:
They can't even manage to get on a ballot and they want to run our government??? I don't think so!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
omnibus66 says:
All of these Republican clowns are irrelevant, so it really doesn't matter which of them are on, or not on the ballot. As more and more Americans become aware (and it is indeed happening) of the truth of what the Republican party is really about, their fantasy of gaining the White House will only be a plot for a new Grimm's fairy tale.
reply
involved_indi replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Obama - 2.5 billion dollars per day added to the national debt. Nothing more needs to be said.
jxknowles replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If you are worried about debt, you should have said something years ago. To dump in on this President's shoulders is both ignorant and irresponsible. He corrected the criminal accounting practices of the Bush administration and told the country the way it actually was. Remember the 'Freedom isn't Free' war cry of the Republican Party for eight years. Check your bumper sticker under the McCain/Palin loser. I'm sure you'll find it somewhere on your gas-guzzler.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
tmn says:
It should be Gin*grinch*, not Gingrich. He is a born loser.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
formeat says:
Presidents are managers. History has continually shown that the most successful of them recruited and placed the very best talent under them. People who could be relied on and paid attention to details. Because whining, finger-pointing, and attempting to deflect blame elsewhere simply validate failure. Mitt Romney and Ron Paul had no problem meeting the necessary requirments to appear on this ballot. Why couldn't Gingrich?

Newt Gingrich has demonstrated that he lacks the skills necessary to manage -- or recruit those who can. He is clearly not qualified to hold the position he seeks.
reply
involved_indi replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
If the first part of your comment is true then we currently have a failed Presidency.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CoachHouser says:
Can someone tell me: Why is Va THAT important? One state will make or break their entire candidacies?
reply
involved_indi replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
It isn't. The decision as to who will run will be mostly made by super Tuesday when 10 states have their primaries. Since Va will only have Ron Paul & Mitt Romney on the ballot it will be dismissed as having any importance and I would guess the turnout would be historically low.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rayward73446 says:
The Republicans have fielded a sorry bunch of candidates that are so under qalified, corrupt, brainless, bigotted, and un-electable. Thier party position on taxes, the middle class, and nonsencical debating of non existant laws will defeat them in 2012. Their so called protection of the " job creators" is a lie, and a poor excuse for their assault on the middle class, the poor, the aged, and the unemployed.
Americans want to work. A job is the only thing between us and losing everything. Republicans have tried everything possible, on every issue, to prevent Pres. Obama from getting Americans back to work in the hope that he can be defeated in 2012. Why did they not do what ever they could to create more jobs? That is what America needed, but Republicans are so out of touch with the average American that we were not considered important by them as they continually pandered to the wealthy, big corporations and big banks. The House of Representatives and the Tea Party have not worked a single day for the betterment of average Americans. Instead they created misinformation, and spin to discredit Obama. Their posturing caused the only downgrade in the USA's credit in history, while creating the so called national debt crisis, which was made worse by a do nothing Congress (House).
We needed our elected officials to work together, and still do. The recession, millions of unemployed are problems that needed all thier attention, constructive input, and compromising skills to correct. Instead they went on a campaign of confrontation, partisanship and greed. Getting America back to work would solve the debt problem, and the budget. But their position was to protect the wealthy and corporations from higher taxes. Putting corporations and the wealthy's wants ahead of the average American is not what was needed, a mistake that should haunt Republicans for decades to come at the polls. The GOP used to be the peoples party, now they have become the right winged wealthy's party. They are more worried about funding to get re-elected than running the country, what they were elected to do.
Their so called job creators have not been creating any jobs, their stance for the wealthy, and against the middle class is nothing more than political self interest. We do not need another do nothing congress. The recession has lasted too long. Millions have lost everything they ever owned, retirement accounts have been decimated, home values have plummeted. All while the GOP did nothing to help us out of the recession. In my opinion, they have won the battle but will lose the war because the GOP needs to convince the average American to vote for them. I plan on giving them the same consideration that they gave to us...nothing!
reply
involved_indi replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Sorry, tried to read your post but couldn't get past the first paragraph. They are all the same to me. Pointless, factless or revisionist rants that ignore current economic & geopolitical reality.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
themooniac says:
LOL, they are both such d-bag knuckleheads anyway, they both stink.... And guess what? The L.A. Times is reporting that Trump changed his party affiliation from GOP to Independent so you can guess what that means. I'm just so happy for the GOP, LOL>ahahahahaha
reply
See all 122 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right