By

Lance Price /

CBS News/ October 12, 2012, 4:24 AM

Jimmy Savile's star falls

Jimmy Savile, who died a year ago shortly before his 85th birthday, was one of Britain's best-known entertainers. I grew up watching him. He was everywhere. A radio DJ, zany TV host, larger than life personality. The Queen had made him 'Sir Jimmy', and he received countless honours for the millions of dollars he raised for charity - particularly childrens' charities. Yet this week the headstone over his grave was removed and broken up. Plaques and street-signs bearing his name were taken down. Because Jimmy Saville was a serial sex offender.

The mountain of evidence that has emerged only since his death, and which nobody denies, is that for decades he abused under-age girls, some as young as nine or ten, and relied on his fame to protect him. He thought he was beyond the reach of the law and he died a popular hero, so in a sense I suppose he was. But the police are now investigating around 120 leads, and new cases are coming to light all the time.

The epitaph on that headstone - 'it was good while it lasted' - feels like a sick joke from beyond the grave. But others have some very serious questions to answer. The BBC, where Savile worked for most of his career, is massively embarrassed. Many of the offences were apparently committed in his dressing room after the young girls in question had appeared on his shows. After he died, an expos? of his alleged offences was pulled by BBC News just days before their entertainment division broadcast a fulsome tribute to the man.

It seems impossible to believe that there weren't people at the BBC and elsewhere who knew what was going on and did nothing to stop it. The British public has been struggling to work out what to learn from it. Many of the crimes were committed in the sixties and seventies and we're told attitudes were different then. Well, maybe, but plenty of people still went to jail for lesser offences.

Once again, it seems there was one rule for the rich and famous and another for everybody else. The question for all of us, though, is what we would do today if we learned of allegations against somebody well-liked and respected. While saying nothing is always the easy option, for serial abusers like Jimmy Savile, other people's silence is their licence to carry on. This is Lance Price for CBS News in London.

© 2012 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
6 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LeighOats says:
Let's hear it for the late great charity worker Jimmy Savile and his longtime indulgent employer the British Broadcasting Corporation.

By all of the recently publicised accounts from the obviously reliable witnesses the revered hospital-visiting knight-nurse recognised that the most important beneficiary of his charitable work was his own sexual urge, and that the currency of donations to that unimpeachable charitable cause was the bestowal on him of sexual favors by children (and there wasn't much that was _odd_ about him---the sources of those donations were almost exclusively of the _female_ variety).

His campaigning motto might as well have been: "Sex appeal---please give generously."
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Pemboc says:
Actually as a UK resident I can honestly say that I do not resent paying for the licence fee- to watch decent programmes- without continuous adverts interupting every 5 minutes- and listen to excellent radio broadcasting- again without annoying adverts.

And Jimmy Saville appears to have been a little more than lascivious, but given he spent christmas at Chequers with Thatcher and had cosy chats with Prince Charles over his troubled marriage, and got handed OBEs - I think we can say he had the majority of people well and truly groomed.

So I can't see why this has to boil down to more BBC bashing- looks like everyone was star struck- although heaven knows why- have you seen those track suits???
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LeighOats says:
Said the BBC's director-general, George Entwistle, in front of a TV camera on I guess Friday 12 October or perhaps the previous day:

"The BBC executive board [. . .] will also examine whether the BBC's [. . .] bullying and harassment policies and practices are now fit for purpose [. . .]."

Um---the said policies and practices seem to have been fully fit for purpose during the recently publicised bullying and harassment activities of the late Jim'll Fix It.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19929967
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LeighOats says:
In these clunky early days of the innernets I find that I must tweak my comment of a few minutes ago to work around the usual pounds-sterling glitch:

It was good while it lasted: the untouchable "Jim'll Fix It", armed with his licence to fiddle with kids, fixing himself up with the helpless touchable.

The UK should now be reappraising not only the lascivious life of the late benighted knight but also the annual TV-licence fee (145.50 pounds for color, 49 pounds for black-and-white) that the BBC is permitted to extort from the residents of the UK.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
LeighOats says:
It was good while it lasted: the untouchable "Jim'll Fix It", armed with his licence to fiddle with kids, fixing himself up with the helpless touchable.

The UK should now be reappraising not only the lascivious life of the late benighted knight but also the annual TV-licence fee (£145.50 for color, £49 for black-and-white) that the BBC is permitted to extort from the residents of the UK.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Denny_Craneftw says:
Jimmy Sandusky?
reply