Government will fund care for 50 types of cancers linked to 9/11 under Zadroga Act
In this Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2001 file photo, pedestrians flee the dust-filled area surrounding the World Trade Center following a terrorist attack on the New York landmark.
/ Amy SancettaDemocratic New York Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Charles Schumer issued a statement with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) on the change Monday.
Federal health officials propose free cancer care for 9/11 first responders
Watch: Study shows rise of cancer in 9/11 firefighters
"It took too long, but the right thing is finally being done for 9/11 heroes,"Sen. Charles Schumer said in a statement to CBS New York station WCBS.
In June, officials at NIOSH had said in an administrative filing that it favored a major expansion of the Zadroga act to include people with the different cancer types that span 14 broad categories of the disease. The decision followed a March recommendation by an advisory committee made up of doctors, union officials and community health advocates, who recommended that cancer be added to the $4.3 billion program. Previously, the aid only covered people with a short list of mostly less-serious ailments, including asthma, acid reflux disease and chronic sinus irritation.
"It's a great decision for anybody suffering from cancer," Sean Riordan, an attorney who represents hundreds of rescue workers who developed cancer sine working at ground zero, told WCBS.
Following the 9/11 attacks, first-responders and nearby residents and workers were subject to high levels of dust and smoke filled with harmful substances like jet fuel, asbestos and other dangerous chemicals.
Scientists say there's little research to prove exposure to toxic dust from the destroyed Twin Towers caused even one kind of cancer. But the advisory panel said it was plausible that first responders and others who were exposed to the toxic dust might get cancer.
Also last September, a comprehensive study in The Lancet found firefighters working at the World Trade Center had 10 percent more cancers than the general public and 19 percent more than firefighters who weren't involved with 9/11.
Dr. David Prezant, chief medical officer of FDNY, and the lead study author of the Lancet report told the CBS Evening News at the time that the association was moderately strong.
"The biggest surprise was that cancer increased," Prezant said at the time. "But that increase is real and now we need to address it."
According to CBS New York, first responder advocates call the announcement a good first step but are concerned there won't be enough funds to cover thousands of others who may potentially be diagnosed with cancer in the future.
"There simple isn't enough money," attorney Michael Barasch told the station. "There are so many rescue workers with debilitating diseases and they're simply not going to get a fair amount."
Popular in Health
- "Clouds" singer known for viral hit dies from osteosarcoma
- Mysterious respiratory disease infects 7 in Ala., 2 dead
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Almost all states seeing big drop in teen birth rates
- Disney pulls show that makes fun of gluten-free child
- Molecule may be able to block cocaine addiction
- Migraines plus depression may equal smaller brain
- Experimental asthma drug helps untreatable patients in study















What about those in Iraq and Afghanistan that work next to open burn pits where they burn everything- plastics, garbage, you name it. The winds blow the toxic clouds and dust across the base and everyone breaths that crap. It's about the closest thing I can think of that would be comparable to what was burning at ground zero.
Will the Govt. step up and recognize those people's exposure too?
So what, the government is not protecting the profits of the health insurance companies?
About 10 years ago, I inhaled some soot from a passing fire truck. Where's my money? I might get cancer. (Doesn't matter that I smoke 2 packs a day)
How did my tax money get involved in the health care of people who live in New York? Were not the towers privately owned. Were not the airliners privately owned. Don't the 1st responders belong to a union that is supposed to take care of them? Insurance companies are supposed to pay (although an "act of war" gets them off the hook.)
We are already paying for the medical care of the residents of Bikini Atoll for popping a nuke on their island in 1954. We promised them free health care for 5 generations. Is this what is going to happen in New York.
I am as Patriotic as the next guy, but enough is enough. Just sucking the "hope and change" we have left in our pockets.
This is not a Federal Issue but a City, County and State issue. NY raise your taxes again since you don't know how to control your Politicians, Wall Streeters and Unions.
But I agree, this is NY's problem. This isn't the nation's problem, and I dont' know how the Fed govt believes it should pay for their care. Are the people in the Pentagon asking for health care help?
NY City/State is just trying to steal money from the federal taxpayers for their problems.